https://t.co/ZCCFxfsCBK
Before paying a hefty amount to learn options trading have a look at this here is the small of Compilation of Options trading learning Series recorded by @vivbajaj which may help you to shorten your learning curve
Caution: Compilation of series is for Serious learners only.
by @Mitesh_Engr
https://t.co/3Y36EplYg4
https://t.co/zM7eRbZDjQ
https://t.co/YVdPWjuyIZ
https://t.co/xZUXErEPMu
https://t.co/5wAqiqNEO3
https://t.co/ZxvfkOr1UC
https://t.co/88N9i4HFDy
https://t.co/1WLiFASsYw
https://t.co/eaawowkj4Y
https://t.co/M5g1Pb1sxN
By @subasish__pani
https://t.co/llH8mGHTuT
https://t.co/43DmdxlFcL
https://t.co/8hnG5Yeh5u
https://t.co/LKkZ2vyQdv
More from Optionslearnings
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
