M&M breakout done @dtbhat
M&M - Expect a breakout above 980, can do 1250-1600 in next 1-1.5 yrs SL 850 CMP 898+@moneyworks4u_fa https://t.co/TILNtF8BWl pic.twitter.com/Vjd2f8ArwV
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) May 13, 2022
More from Shivaji Vitthalrao🇮🇳
Quiz Answer
Copper break below 4.43 qualify as bearish Flag and pole
HINDCOPPER break below 157 qualify as bearish Flag n pole.
Impact copper can test 4.28-4.20
HINDCOPPER can test 150-141 as per pattern targets.
165-166 Lakshman Rekha.
Copper break below 4.43 qualify as bearish Flag and pole
HINDCOPPER break below 157 qualify as bearish Flag n pole.
Impact copper can test 4.28-4.20
HINDCOPPER can test 150-141 as per pattern targets.
165-166 Lakshman Rekha.
Quiz - Hindcopper
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) June 9, 2021
What pattern do you see?
whats the confirmation level and impact ?
Both are interlinked. https://t.co/0gVaRXd4pS pic.twitter.com/Bbs1rdaOWf
#NTPC when was the last time stock moved 20rs(15%) in 4 days?
What was on the charts ?
Once 135 was crossed there was no looking back @moneyworks4u_fa
Lots of hints given 😊🙏
What was on the charts ?
Once 135 was crossed there was no looking back @moneyworks4u_fa
Lots of hints given 😊🙏
#NTPC -- On the verge of 13yr breakout above 140-144 can do 170-180 pic.twitter.com/eDBGHVqlYz
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) March 24, 2022
More from Mnm
Mahindra & Mahindra - updated chart
A bullish flag pattern right after the breakout. Although the broader rectangle target of 1190 is way more than this bullish flag target https://t.co/wdAzb7SS7L
A bullish flag pattern right after the breakout. Although the broader rectangle target of 1190 is way more than this bullish flag target https://t.co/wdAzb7SS7L
Interesting chart of Mahindra & Mahindra consolidating in a rectangle pattern & the price not falling back to the lower support. pic.twitter.com/GJ7rCfkB9f
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) May 26, 2022
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x