We are living a most devious world with so called experts & the all media who are clearly out in force using persuasion & psychology to try & get the publuc with this Dystopian Technoracy Agenda!

The harder the times the less most people think because they are too busy surviving to worry about the in's & out's of the eugenic Dystopia thats coming.
I remember years ago when this front organisation for the 20 Big Banking families called the United Nations, put out info about how the gap between rich & poor was growing but it also meant the middle where the chasm was the middle class was disappearing.
It was always the idea to erradicate the middle class, because the ststem you believe or think it is, is a vastly different system to what it really is.
You only have to look at the characters who own the ststem to see the system that gives you a few rights for you to live in. Its not untill you come up against the brickwalls they put up that they tell you that you don't have any rights at all.
If you look at the Keep Britain Free Full Judgement from the Appeal Court, you are being told by the Judges that you have absolutely no rights & that the State under which you are now "ruled" under the Coronavirus Act completly controls & owns you. https://t.co/umRbHTyC2p
Note well the war type language used by Boris Johnson in terms of the Covid idea " A War aganist Covid-19". The State do love to be legalistic they don't care if you understand what they are saying or not, the language they use is a declaration of legality.
And, it goes unchallenged by the public. Remember the Nixon Government "War in Cancer"&"War in Drugs" & Blair's "War on Terrorism". The "War on Cancer" conology was when tax payers money really started to flood into the Big Boy Foundations & Trusts medical fields & vaccinations
to make big companies very very rich & give them authority over you by giving you fear. Fear of pandemics etc it's like an air-raid drill that puts people through all the heightened emotion & keeps them thinking its the real thing. They do it all the time.
They concrete it into your mind. They get you ready gor it through your Pavlovian Conditioning to coin the term that 'you are a bad person'. This negates any problem you might have over getting any particular type of vaccination by force.
And, get the other type among the public to become cohersed, here's an excellent example of inverted cohersion works to shepherd the people in.
👇 at 7.36
https://t.co/TyHpXzd0He
You see "Right" are an impedement to being "Ruled" not 'Governed' but "Ruled" in this technorpcratic system run by experts can only be done by the pepetual threats of war & war on disease which is to take us into austerity, which is manufactured planned poverty.
Of course you're a conspiracy theorist if you think there are nasty people out there who want to get you. It's horrible to think Government's & Big Corps willingly work hand in hand happy killing people, even though its happening right now, people still won't believe it.

You May Also Like

I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.


Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel

He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:

He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:

He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?