More from Pulp Librarian
More from Marketing
Marketing 101: building a personal brand
- what does personal brand mean
- why should you care
- how to distinguish it against the company you work for
- how to do it w/ support from your boss
- how to build yours
A thread 🧵
Personal brand has a negative stigma in some circles.
Personal brand does NOT mean you are a self centered narcissist.
Personal branding is intentional use of your time, voice, channel and platforms.
Why intentionality is important:
How you invest your time = How you will spend your life
Social media can become passive and addicting without true meaning and intention.
Don’t waste your life reading other people’s highlight reel, make your own.
Being a creator > being a consumer
How can you be intentional?
Similar to building a brand strategy: know what you stand for as a person
What lights you up? (Your mission)
What value do you want to bring to the table? (Value props)
How do you deliver it? (Voice and tone)
Reminder on brand strategy 101 ⬇️
- what does personal brand mean
- why should you care
- how to distinguish it against the company you work for
- how to do it w/ support from your boss
- how to build yours
A thread 🧵
Personal brand has a negative stigma in some circles.
Personal brand does NOT mean you are a self centered narcissist.
Personal branding is intentional use of your time, voice, channel and platforms.
Why intentionality is important:
How you invest your time = How you will spend your life
Social media can become passive and addicting without true meaning and intention.
Don’t waste your life reading other people’s highlight reel, make your own.
Being a creator > being a consumer
How can you be intentional?
Similar to building a brand strategy: know what you stand for as a person
What lights you up? (Your mission)
What value do you want to bring to the table? (Value props)
How do you deliver it? (Voice and tone)
Reminder on brand strategy 101 ⬇️
How to build a brand strategy from 0-1: a beginning guide
— Amanda Goetz (@AmandaMGoetz) August 10, 2020
// \U0001f9f5
How to destroy your competition with Cold Email
Want numbers like this?
I am going to show you exactly how to GUARANTEE your cold emails will convert.
// THREAD //
First, I am going to show you the structure of a killer cold email.
---
{{Quick Question about Company_Name}} <-- Subject line
Hey {{Name}}, [[first line}} <-- individual personalization is key
We just helped ___, a business like yours, do x in y days <-- Case study
I'm 100% certain we can do something similar for you.
Do you have time for a call this week? <-- CTA
--------
Let's break this down.
Our main goal is to not sound automated. (even though it was in a way)
How do we do that?
Highly Personalized First Lines.
We have their:
- Company Name
- First Name
- LinkedIn Profile
I use https://t.co/cotgiyqqLE to scrape this. (not aff)
The better the first line, the better the cold email will convert.
We need 10/10 first lines.
A good offer + a bad first line = 60% open & 8% reply rate
A good offer + a 10/10 first line = 80% open & 20% reply rate
Run the numbers.
Want numbers like this?
I am going to show you exactly how to GUARANTEE your cold emails will convert.
// THREAD //
First, I am going to show you the structure of a killer cold email.
---
{{Quick Question about Company_Name}} <-- Subject line
Hey {{Name}}, [[first line}} <-- individual personalization is key
We just helped ___, a business like yours, do x in y days <-- Case study
I'm 100% certain we can do something similar for you.
Do you have time for a call this week? <-- CTA
--------
Let's break this down.
Our main goal is to not sound automated. (even though it was in a way)
How do we do that?
Highly Personalized First Lines.
We have their:
- Company Name
- First Name
- LinkedIn Profile
I use https://t.co/cotgiyqqLE to scrape this. (not aff)
The better the first line, the better the cold email will convert.
We need 10/10 first lines.
A good offer + a bad first line = 60% open & 8% reply rate
A good offer + a 10/10 first line = 80% open & 20% reply rate
Run the numbers.
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.