Places like @CNN were happy to hype the group up without pausing to consider if they might be awful.
ЁЯз╡THREADЁЯз╡
Today we learned more about how awful @ProjectLincoln is.
If youтАЩre wondering how these guys survived for so long, itтАЩs because tons of people in the media & beyond boosted this pack of no-good grifters.
And IтАЩve got the receipts to remind them.тд╡я╕П
Places like @CNN were happy to hype the group up without pausing to consider if they might be awful.
I mean, seriously? Their plan тАЬfor preserving the unionтАЭ?
I mean, cтАЩmon!
And MSNBC didnтАЩt bother to bring up any of their scandals even after they were fully public knowledge.
Which, of course, never materialized. YouтАЩll remember that @ProjectLincoln was so effective against Susan Collins that she won in a landslide.
At right was the actual review of the ads after the fact.
Really makes you wonder why no one was poking around through the groupтАЩs relatively well-known misdeeds.
Again. No evidence to suggest they did *anything* against Trump or down the ballot.
Perhaps none more so than top @ProjectLincoln reply guy - you guessed it! - @JRubinBlogger.
Also, still cackling about the poll.
That take has aged...imperfectly.
https://t.co/JK1S57Jwch
@AVindman (remember him?)
@SteveKerr (??)
@ananavarro (quickly becoming a thread favorite) and
@JoeNBC (go figure)
Guys like @therickwilson last won an election when the biggest threat was Y2K. He got famous for being vulgar after that.
What were we expecting?
Turns out, they were, and they fell for @ProjectLincoln - hard.
DidnтАЩt it seem a little too rich? Anyone?
You May Also Like
1/12
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw
