#jubilantfoodworks #Dominos #Dunkin #popeyes Bounceback candidate as its highly oversold.
We may consolidation at current level for any further move. https://t.co/zgs6fyIfAp
#jubilantfoodworks #Dominos #Dunkin #popeyes
— Pranay Prasun (@PranayPrasun) February 19, 2022
I was expecting reversal from 3000-3100 level but didn't work and looks like we may see 2600-2700 level
~ Already booked small loss and waiting for right entry
~ Shared weekly chart for reference https://t.co/OFsuLsYN2z pic.twitter.com/ZUSZcf20OB
More from Pranay Prasun
**Don't miss this move**
All alerts in advance🔥👇
#LUPIN #cnxpharma Consolidation Consolidation & Consolidation
— Pranay Prasun (@PranayPrasun) April 18, 2021
but in tight range \U0001f9d0\U0001f447@Jitendra_stock @gogrithekhabri @piyushchaudhry @caniravkaria https://t.co/8G4KQjYM4i pic.twitter.com/yDIX71tnOp
Expecting breakout retest in weekly chart near 1130 level
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?