"Its fundamental to Zionism to encourage islamophobia and anti Arab racism too."
Yesterday at an event attended by 350 people including former @UKLabour MP @DerbyChrisW, @BristolUni Prof David Miller, @STWuk Steering committee & occasional @guardian commenter Sami Ramadani spoke about Jews as a global Zionist conspiracy.
"Its fundamental to Zionism to encourage islamophobia and anti Arab racism too."
https://t.co/S4implzBMT
WATCH Prof David Miller of @BristolUni
— Harry's Place (@hurryupharry) February 13, 2021
"The enemy that we face here is Zionism" there is "An all out onslaught by the Israeli government...on the left globally"
This is Soviet antisemitism, the assertion that there's a global Zionist conspiracy against the left pic.twitter.com/jgjKILAJoj
"The problem we have is that the political class has been captured in this country on both sides of the chamber in the house of commons all political parties have been captured by the Zionist lobby and corporate capitalism..."
Says of Loach "he was accused of having a history of blatant antisemitism which of course is a complete lie!"
No it isn't.
Lets take a quick look at those two...
https://t.co/1I9oiR30CB
Ken Loach continues his decades long project of trolling the Jewish community.
— Corbyn in the Times / Crime from Times Past (@TimesCorbyn) July 16, 2019
Loach the man who 'directed' Perdition: Which 'took the greatest tragedy in Jewish history the Holocaust, & transformed it into a product of Jewish treachery, from which the Zionists benefited.' https://t.co/A6ikAYsmTq
https://t.co/2MAhKidpoi
"It is deeply, deeply offensive to me that there are groups of people that behave as if Jewish people first were the only victims of the Holocaust which they were not." pic.twitter.com/vPTlQp01kM
— Harry's Place (@hurryupharry) December 13, 2020
@LondonMetUni is he a senior lecturer at your institution as he has claimed in the past?
"This campaign to silence critics of Israel has been latched upon by ruling classes, especially in imperialist countries like UK & USA..."
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
