More from DTBhat
#TATAPOWER futures on daily charts, finally breaks out of the tight range. Open counts are at 150 and 187. https://t.co/lPshkD3FeA
#TataPower on daily charts - a breakout above 126 will be very interesting. It is bullish on higher boxsizes and has given a reversal after a pullback on lower boxsize. Price charts and RS charts self-explanatory pic.twitter.com/9ulYjvBVza
— DTBhat (@dtbhat) July 12, 2021
More from Irctc
IRCTC - Learning?
Runaway Gaps are traded like flag & pennant patterns. The price move before the gap is projected upwards for the price target. Here the target comes out to be 3230. https://t.co/QuKrekfHG3
Runaway Gaps are traded like flag & pennant patterns. The price move before the gap is projected upwards for the price target. Here the target comes out to be 3230. https://t.co/QuKrekfHG3
IRCTC - A perfect pullback on low volumes after a high volume breakout. Low-risk setup. Weak below 2015 pic.twitter.com/jSHBlEhkE0
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) June 9, 2021
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".