#Watchlist
Both Daily & Weekly :)
#IRCTC (WEEKLY):- 2094.8 CMP LOOKS GOOD FOR MORE UPSIDE :)
1) Weekly Breakout :)
2) Textbook Pattern
#Disclaimer:-I just shared view for only educational purpose.
#priceaction #IRCTC #TradingView
@RajarshitaS
@Rishikesh_ADX
More from Sagar Solanki
#GUJGASLTD (2 hours): -687.5 CMP, with support If 680 holds, then 730/800 is on the way :)
#Disclaimer:- View shared is for educational purposes only. Conduct your due diligence before making any trading/investment decisions.
@caniravkaria @nishkumar1977 https://t.co/IoIa9TASCm
Gujarat Gas.... CMP 700...
— Nirav S. Karia (@caniravkaria) September 3, 2021
Baby \U0001f37c \U0001f425 steps \U0001fa9c
Request views and guidance from experts \U0001f64f
(Purely for educational purposes) pic.twitter.com/Eidd0AHZlz
More from Irctc
patience is virtue
no exit. though its slightly overbought, any retracement could be chance
2700 level brings more strength
#IRCTC 1% x 3 cmp 1759
— Sunil Dhawan\U0001f6a9 \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@SunilDhawan13) February 28, 2021
chart to level mapping@Definedge https://t.co/nP50vq4PJb pic.twitter.com/tzUq1ICIMb
approching upper trendine , might took a small pause or need to break resistance with good volumes
target was 2900 , made high 2897 , with just 3 points short.
booking some positions as reached near resistance , will add near supportive trendline,
holding rest for 3600 https://t.co/2H0myGPgu5
Itctc
— Vibhor Varshney (@nakulvibhor) September 2, 2021
Entered 2800 \u2705
Heading towards 2900 target
Then 3600
Holding personally in folio \U0001f44d https://t.co/jd2OOQTSLs
1. Still 200/400 point movement left as per Ascending Triangle Pattern.
2. Stock perfectly moved according to the classic pattern.
3. Next level to watch now 3500-4000
4. Support near 2600-2800 https://t.co/VrUhS85Rml
NSE:IRCTC 1775 +2.78%
— Mr. Chartist (@Mr_Chartist) February 26, 2021
-Cup and Handle breakout
-Support at 1600/1650
-Next levels at 1900/2000/2100++#TA pic.twitter.com/LxpPTI0rB6
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the
ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.
Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this
Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35