Categories India
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
#LIVE Delhi High Court Women Lawyers Forum in Association with LiveLaw is conducting a Webinar on the topic 'Attack On Love Marriages And Freedom Of Choice'.
#FreedomOfChoice
Watch the Webinar live at :
YouTube link: https://t.co/l074foe9RA
Facebook link:
https://t.co/d0m3h0Ut1w
Instagram Link:
Advocate Kajal Chandra begins the webinar and introduces the panelist Justice AP Shah, Delhi High Court’s Former Chief Justice. Advocate Gayatri Virmani introduces Human Rights Activist Jagmati Sangwan.
#FreedomOfChoice
The moderator Adv Chandra questions Justice Shah: Do the freedom of Religious ordinance of laws stand the test of Constitutionality and in your opinion, do they violate the fundamental right of liberty including the freedom to choose? #FreedomOfOpinion
Delhi High Court’s Former Chief Justice AP Shah: This topic cannot be discussed without referring to the Indian Constitution that guarantees Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity and protects dignity of individual and Unity and integrity of the Nation. #FreedomOfChoice
#FreedomOfChoice
Watch the Webinar live at :
YouTube link: https://t.co/l074foe9RA
Facebook link:
https://t.co/d0m3h0Ut1w
Instagram Link:
Advocate Kajal Chandra begins the webinar and introduces the panelist Justice AP Shah, Delhi High Court’s Former Chief Justice. Advocate Gayatri Virmani introduces Human Rights Activist Jagmati Sangwan.
#FreedomOfChoice
The moderator Adv Chandra questions Justice Shah: Do the freedom of Religious ordinance of laws stand the test of Constitutionality and in your opinion, do they violate the fundamental right of liberty including the freedom to choose? #FreedomOfOpinion
Delhi High Court’s Former Chief Justice AP Shah: This topic cannot be discussed without referring to the Indian Constitution that guarantees Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity and protects dignity of individual and Unity and integrity of the Nation. #FreedomOfChoice
As many of you would have encountered this article filled with lies & bigotry, which is financed by leftist-islamist media blocs including Scroll, wire, Aljazeera etc. The fake exaggeration in numbers of Jammu massacre is deliberately done to dwarf Hindu massacres in J&K in 1947.
So how many muslims died in Jammu massacre?. Article quotes more than 230k but how can dead be more than the population itself. As many still lived in Jammu. Here is the census report of 1941.
And one thing to be Kept in mind is that Jammu district is not Jammu province of 1941 as much of that went to pakistan which was heavily muslim majority and still is.
These Hindu haters deliberately try to confuse this point, so as to support their filthy lies & Bigotry.
Here is excerpt from Pawan Dewans book "Jammu" which has compiled and analysed all sources.
So the count should be less than 17k . Although a tragedy but nothing infront of Hindus who suffered complete annihilation in Mirpur, Rajauri etc.
Even the India Hater Yusuf Saraf has given the figure of 20k in his book "Kashmir a struggle for freedom"
Islamist misquote Snedden who just mention about the rumours of 237k and even mentions it as exaggeration. He literally writes that research is needed on Jammu massacre.
OMG BATTA CAUGHT LYING flat. You cowards would never put your neck on line for Muslims ! Never Ever ! Nehru in PMs seat was aware of HariSingh, RSS and Master Tara Singh colluding to execute the #JammuMassacre. If he wished he could have stopped it ! (1/n)https://t.co/RioRxr8APa
— I am Kashmir ! (@KaeshurCraftsmn) January 4, 2021
So how many muslims died in Jammu massacre?. Article quotes more than 230k but how can dead be more than the population itself. As many still lived in Jammu. Here is the census report of 1941.
And one thing to be Kept in mind is that Jammu district is not Jammu province of 1941 as much of that went to pakistan which was heavily muslim majority and still is.
These Hindu haters deliberately try to confuse this point, so as to support their filthy lies & Bigotry.
Here is excerpt from Pawan Dewans book "Jammu" which has compiled and analysed all sources.
So the count should be less than 17k . Although a tragedy but nothing infront of Hindus who suffered complete annihilation in Mirpur, Rajauri etc.
Even the India Hater Yusuf Saraf has given the figure of 20k in his book "Kashmir a struggle for freedom"
Islamist misquote Snedden who just mention about the rumours of 237k and even mentions it as exaggeration. He literally writes that research is needed on Jammu massacre.
Hindutva does not belong to Modi nor his party, it belongs to the people as a unifying, decolonial ideology similar to pan-Africanism or Yugoslavism.
His own brand of "positive secularism" is even milder - deepening special rights and welfare schemes for religious minorities.
After the disbanding of the Hindu Mahasabha and Jana Sangh, Hindutva as a political ideology does not even exist, except as a bogeyman in the minds of the Anglophone elite.
Even the BJP gave up Hindutva for civic nationalism, Gandhian socialism, and positive secularism in 1980s.
Under Modi, there has been compete policy continuity on minority rights and welfare from the Congress era, with little to no "Hindutva agenda" coming to see the light of day.
The most radical policy they can dream of is religion-neutral laws and equal rights for equal citizens.
Hindutva was essential in forming a national consciousness, but was abandoned with time. The modern BJP refuses to self-identify as a Hindutva movement, adopting moderates like Sardar Patel, Deendayal Upadhyay, and JP Narayan as their icons, rather than Savarkar or the Mahasabha.
When they say Hindu Rashtra, all they mean is an "Indic polity".
When British India was partitioned into a Muslim homeland and a Dharmic homeland, one state became a 'Ghazi' garrison state, and one the successor state to the Indic
His own brand of "positive secularism" is even milder - deepening special rights and welfare schemes for religious minorities.
I'm not entirely comfortable with Modi's "Hindutva".
— Onye Nkuzi (@cchukudebelu) February 2, 2021
I know many of my Indian followers will come at me, angrily - but let me just say this out.
I'm not sure it is a great model for democracy in a diverse, multi-cultural developing nation.
After the disbanding of the Hindu Mahasabha and Jana Sangh, Hindutva as a political ideology does not even exist, except as a bogeyman in the minds of the Anglophone elite.
Even the BJP gave up Hindutva for civic nationalism, Gandhian socialism, and positive secularism in 1980s.
Under Modi, there has been compete policy continuity on minority rights and welfare from the Congress era, with little to no "Hindutva agenda" coming to see the light of day.
The most radical policy they can dream of is religion-neutral laws and equal rights for equal citizens.
Hindutva was essential in forming a national consciousness, but was abandoned with time. The modern BJP refuses to self-identify as a Hindutva movement, adopting moderates like Sardar Patel, Deendayal Upadhyay, and JP Narayan as their icons, rather than Savarkar or the Mahasabha.
When they say Hindu Rashtra, all they mean is an "Indic polity".
When British India was partitioned into a Muslim homeland and a Dharmic homeland, one state became a 'Ghazi' garrison state, and one the successor state to the Indic