This is not media creation or creation because of weak Oppn in state.
@myogiadityanath Brand UP is creation of his own hardwork in ground through effective governance and he is self made politician.
I haven't tweeted much about Uttar Pradesh Politics.
Some were asking me whether @yadavakhilesh will have revival like Tejaswi Yadav of Bihar in Uttar Pradesh elections.
Simple 1 Point Reply - This is @myogiadityanath governing Uttar Pradesh not @NitishKumar of Bihar.
This is not media creation or creation because of weak Oppn in state.
@myogiadityanath Brand UP is creation of his own hardwork in ground through effective governance and he is self made politician.
BJP is sitting pretty with 42% without any allaince partner, without any campaigning Just in Brand Value of @myogiadityanath it is in position to easily reach 300 seats.
1.Sugarcane,
2.Muslims Menace
3.Better infra
Supporting Tikait on Moral and Biradri basis is different and voting is totally different things.
This Rld Exists in few assembly segments in Bhagpat, Kairana, Amroha, Bijnor, Mathura and Muzzafarnagar.
Jayanth Choudary or his father can't even contest in Chapprauli and become Mla.
They are popular in studios.
So 7% Rajputs n 4%Gujjars already cross polarizing seeing the nonsense by Ajith Singh and That Rakesh Tikait.
Basically, entire Jat vote bank will not shift & Gujjar Rajputs Sainis will vote enmasse(95% Levels) .
* @myogiadityanath comes from *, Mayawati and Mullayum belong from West Uttar Pradesh but Yogi is East UP
More from India
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
