‘Opposition asks who are the officials in the Centre named in the Arnab Goswami leaked WhatsApp conversations?’
10 QUESTIONS OVER #ArnabChatGate – What the Opposition wants to know?
‘Can Centre explain who leaked military secrets to Arnab Goswami in the aftermath of Pulwama attack?’
‘Opposition asks who are the officials in the Centre named in the Arnab Goswami leaked WhatsApp conversations?’
‘How was it that Arnab Goswami knew about Centre’s move to dilute the provisions of Article 370 even before Opposition was informed?’
‘Will the Centre institute an inquiry under the official secrets act to determine the source of the military secrets leak to Arnab Goswami?’
‘Opposition asks Centre to name officials mentioned in PMO by Arnab Goswami in his WhatsApp chats to ex-BARC chief Partho Dasgupta?’
‘How free and frequent was Arnab Goswami’s access to the PMO and what help did he succeed in leveraging for his business?’
‘Will Centre appoint a JPC into Arnab Goswami’s what’s chats pointing to leak of classified military secrets from a source at the Centre?’
‘Who in government played with the lives of our military men and women by ‘leaking’ strike plans to Arnab Goswami ahead of Balakot punitive strikes?’
More from India
You May Also Like
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.