Presenting you the 1st Phase Opinion Poll of West Bengal Vidhan Sabha Election 2021 by Bongo Prokash. It's a joint venture by me & @ThePaulSaheb, 2 more such polls will be out in March. Please give your feedback. Constructive criticism will be appreciated trolls will be blocked.
More from India
Dumb£dk@r wasn't like Pe£riyar?
He was an Anti-Hindu m0r0n just like Periy@r.
Yes it's true that he criticised K2@s but that doesn't make him any useful for Hindus.
His writings will remind you a lot of JNU Urban Naxals like Kanhaiya.
"Ancient Hindus had no sexual morals, brother cohabited with sister, son with mother, father with daughter... Men freely shared women & none had exclusive right over her... Prostitution flourished in the worst form...bestiality prevailed, done even by Rishis."
Riddles in Hinduism
This is what Shri Ram said in Kishkindha-Kanda of Valmiki Ramayana regarding such immoral relationships.
But how could Neela Katt@ppa not realize this?
Because he severely lacking analytical capabilities of Hindu texts.
"Hindu Gods were miserable cowards who had to hide behind their wives to save themselves from Asuras. How could these cowards give power to Shakti? Did the Brahmins invent the practice of worshipping of Goddesses to put a new commodity in the market?"
Riddles in Hinduism.
He was an Anti-Hindu m0r0n just like Periy@r.
A wonderful piece from the Quora space "Tamil Right-Wingers"https://t.co/qokR0GQw4A
— Soumili Das (\u0938\u094c\u092e\u093f\u0932\u0940 \u0926\u093e\u0938 ) (\u09b8\u09cc\u09ae\u09bf\u09b2\u09c0 \u09a6\u09be\u09b8 ) (@Soumili_Squeaks) February 2, 2021
Yes it's true that he criticised K2@s but that doesn't make him any useful for Hindus.
His writings will remind you a lot of JNU Urban Naxals like Kanhaiya.
"Ancient Hindus had no sexual morals, brother cohabited with sister, son with mother, father with daughter... Men freely shared women & none had exclusive right over her... Prostitution flourished in the worst form...bestiality prevailed, done even by Rishis."
Riddles in Hinduism
This is what Shri Ram said in Kishkindha-Kanda of Valmiki Ramayana regarding such immoral relationships.
But how could Neela Katt@ppa not realize this?
Because he severely lacking analytical capabilities of Hindu texts.
"Hindu Gods were miserable cowards who had to hide behind their wives to save themselves from Asuras. How could these cowards give power to Shakti? Did the Brahmins invent the practice of worshipping of Goddesses to put a new commodity in the market?"
Riddles in Hinduism.
People you're seeing in TV posing as locals of #SinghuBorder are NOT locals. Infact, locals are extremely warm with the protestors. This is what real locals have to say!
No one has a problem with protestors at #SinghuBorder. Who were the ones who came to protest??
https://t.co/l3xWK8z0m7
#IndiaStandsWithFarmers
Sweeetestt ❣️❣️❣️
No one has a problem with protestors at #SinghuBorder. Who were the ones who came to protest??
https://t.co/l3xWK8z0m7
#IndiaStandsWithFarmers
Sweeetestt ❣️❣️❣️
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?