Kary Mullis won a Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1993.

His most famous achievement was the invention of PCR, the method being used around the world to test for Covid-19.

I've been asking myself: what would he think of current events?

It's time for a thread. 👇👇

Please retweet.

In one of life's strange coincidences, Mullis died in August 2019 - just months before the first cases of Covid were allegedly discovered in China.

Since I can't ask him for his latest thoughts, I've read his book, "Dancing Naked in the Mind Field".

Here are the six best bits.
1. The invention of PCR.

The idea for "polymerase chain reaction" came to Mullis while driving at night through the Californian countryside.

With PCR, he could make "as many copies as I wanted of any DNA sequence I chose".

He predicted he would win the Nobel prize for this.
2. Battling with the safety officer.

Mullis invented PCR while working at a biotechnology company called Cetus.

He enjoyed working there, but he hated its embrace of safety culture. He hated the "safety officer" who was given power over him.
He called this man the "danger officer", because "all he ever did was put up DANGER signs".

This man covered up his glass cabinets with warning stickers, making it impossible to see the chemicals inside.

"Overnight, my lab had become a very dangerous place".
The safety officer also objected to Mullis storing beer bottles in the same fridge as his radioactive isotopes.

Mullis argued that radiation couldn't escape from a lead-lined container. Mullis won this battle because the president of Cetus also liked taking beer from the fridge.
3. Defending OJ Simpson.

Mullis was asked to be an expert witness at the murder trial of OJ Simpson, though he did not ultimately testify.

He had testified for the defense at murder trials before - "my role was to make sure the PCR-DNA work had been done fairly and accurately".
In OJ's case, Mullis thought "most of the DNA evidence should be thrown out on first principles."

Why? It was a "one-man line-up" - only OJ's DNA was tested. It was impossible to be sure that the test would not also put some other presumed innocent person at the crime scene.
Furthermore, the blood should have been stored without OJ's name on it, so that those carrying out the test wouldn't know whether the prosecution wanted a positive result.

Today, governments are mass testing for SARS-CoV-2 and nothing else. Another "one-man line-up". perhaps?
4. Nobody is taking care of us.

At 22, Mullis realised there was nobody taking care of humanity - no group of older, wiser people looking out for our best interests.

He realised this when his "description of the entire universe" was published by Nature.

https://t.co/HNDqg6yJxy
Despite his "limited experience as a cosmologist", this piece of work was taken seriously by the foremost scientific journal in the world. The media picked up on it and he became internationally notorious for it.

But he knew that it was really just a "tentative hypothesis".
By contrast, the major scientific journals rejected him when he wanted to share the discovery of PCR - something which he knew would be extremely useful.

Nature and Science couldn't see it, and both turned him down.

He was eventually published by "Methods in Enzymology".
This experience taught him that not even scientific journals could be trusted, let alone the unscientific news media.

"The media are at the mercy of the scientists who have the ability to summon them, and the scientists who have such ability are not often minding the store."
5. Science is corrupt.

Mullis agreed with Nobel-winning economist James Buchanan: "there is no vested interest in seeing a fair evaluation of a public scientific issue".

Voters don't have time to study politics, so they are preyed on by politicians, bureaucrats and lobbyists.
Scientific advisors to governments, according to Mullis, are "always having to come up with the imminent disasters that can be prevented by governmental projects, sponsored by informed and well-meaning politicians".

What they are really doing is manipulating the public.
Mullis singles out the UN's IPCC, the EPA and others for providing corrupted science to politicians.

"If you can't actually measure something, or make an accurate prediction from a theory, and present it to a group of your fellows, be good enough not to disturb us about it."
As a result of the politically motivated funding of scientific research, Mullis says there is "very little experimental verification" when it comes to "important societal issues".

"Some of the big truths voters have accepted have little or no scientific basis."

Plus ça change..
6. AIDS: a symptom plus a positive test result.

Mullis was one of the most prominent scientists to question the connection between HIV and AIDS.

On reading this chapter of the book, I was shocked by the parallels between HIV/AIDS and SARS-Cov-2/Covid-19.

Buckle yourself in...
Mullis became interested in AIDS when he was involved in testing blood samples for retroviruses such as HIV.

When he looked for evidence that HIV caused AIDS, he could not find any experimental research to support this claim.

He kept asking for it, but nobody could provide it.
He then came across Peter Duesberg, a virologist at Berkeley, who said that no such evidence existed.

In this 2015 lecture, Duesberg notes that all of his funding from the US government's NIH abruptly dried up, as soon as he became a HIV-AIDS dissenter.

https://t.co/QHgNKDvztl
By contrast, Duesberg's former colleague at the National Cancer Institute, Robert Gallo, had no problems getting funded.

President Reagan's AIDS-related funding jumped to the billions on the back of Gallo's advice.

Gallo admitted in 1991 that he hadn't really discovered HIV.
So what are the similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and HIV? After listening to Mullis and Duesberg, I can think of many.

(1) Bad predictions.

The WHO was accused of making exaggerated, fear-inducing forecasts of AIDS deaths on the back of dodgy computer modelling.

Sound familiar?
(2) A disease of many symptoms.

According to Mullis, the CDC definition of AIDS was "one of more than 30 diseases", plus a positive antibody test. The list was constantly expanding.

Without a positive test, you only had some boring disease, not a killer virus.

Sound familiar?

More from History

You May Also Like

🌿𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 : 𝑫𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒗𝒂 & 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒏𝒖

Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W


Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela


The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.


One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.


Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"
🌺श्री गरुड़ पुराण - संक्षिप्त वर्णन🌺

हिन्दु धर्म के 18 पुराणों में से एक गरुड़ पुराण का हिन्दु धर्म में बड़ा महत्व है। गरुड़ पुराण में मृत्यु के बाद सद्गती की व्याख्या मिलती है। इस पुराण के अधिष्ठातृ देव भगवान विष्णु हैं, इसलिए ये वैष्णव पुराण है।


गरुड़ पुराण के अनुसार हमारे कर्मों का फल हमें हमारे जीवन-काल में तो मिलता ही है परंतु मृत्यु के बाद भी अच्छे बुरे कार्यों का उनके अनुसार फल मिलता है। इस कारण इस पुराण में निहित ज्ञान को प्राप्त करने के लिए घर के किसी सदस्य की मृत्यु के बाद का समय निर्धारित किया गया है...

..ताकि उस समय हम जीवन-मरण से जुड़े सभी सत्य जान सकें और मृत्यु के कारण बिछडने वाले सदस्य का दुख कम हो सके।
गरुड़ पुराण में विष्णु की भक्ति व अवतारों का विस्तार से उसी प्रकार वर्णन मिलता है जिस प्रकार भगवत पुराण में।आरम्भ में मनु से सृष्टि की उत्पत्ति,ध्रुव चरित्र की कथा मिलती है।


तदुपरांत सुर्य व चंद्र ग्रहों के मंत्र, शिव-पार्वती मंत्र,इन्द्र सम्बंधित मंत्र,सरस्वती मंत्र और नौ शक्तियों के बारे में विस्तार से बताया गया है।
इस पुराण में उन्नीस हज़ार श्लोक बताए जाते हैं और इसे दो भागों में कहा जाता है।
प्रथम भाग में विष्णुभक्ति और पूजा विधियों का उल्लेख है।

मृत्यु के उपरांत गरुड़ पुराण के श्रवण का प्रावधान है ।
पुराण के द्वितीय भाग में 'प्रेतकल्प' का विस्तार से वर्णन और नरकों में जीव के पड़ने का वृत्तांत मिलता है। मरने के बाद मनुष्य की क्या गति होती है, उसका किस प्रकार की योनियों में जन्म होता है, प्रेत योनि से मुक्ति के उपाय...
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.