Cross-sectional imaging often reveals unexpected pancreatic cystic lesions, it is a frequent clinical problem, Should we observe or remove it? What's the diagnosis? Is our patient in danger of malignancy?
Don’t miss this @aegastro @my_ueg #EducAEG #UEGambassador twitter thread

Importance of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms (PCN):
Most are asymptomatic at diagnosis, frequency increases with age
Symptoms: acute pancreatitis (Wirsung obstructed by the cyst or mucus), pain, obstructive chronic pancreatitis, jaundice
> symptoms, >malignancy risk!
Classification of PCN:
Mucinous: intraductal papillary mucinous neop. and mucinous cystic neop.
Nonmucinous: serous cystic neoplasm, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm and cystic neuroendocrine tumours
Endoderm- derived columnar epithelium is characteristic for mucinous lesions
👇
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN)
Characterized by papillary proliferation+mucus production. It may involve Wirsung (becomes dilated) and/or branch ducts (cysts connected to the ductal system). It may evolve to pancreatic cancer particularly if Wirsung is involved
IPMN subtypes :
Intestinal: main duct, head, 40%->coloid/tubular adenoca
Pancreatobiliary: main duct,head, 68%->tubular adenoca
Oncocytic: rare, nodules,50%-> coloid/tubular adenoca
Gastric: most frequent, branch-type, uncinate, 10%->tubular adenoca
https://t.co/CyvfrBGrXZ
IPMN: risk factors for malignancy
Main duct involvement (60% in resected specimens vs 10 to 30% in resected side branch IPMNs), specially>1cm
Contrast-enhanced mural nodules
Size>3-4cm
Symptoms
Pts at risk of PDAC even in other regions of the gland without involvement
👇👇👇
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms -> management: follow these guidelines:
European guidelines 2018 @Gut_BMJ @chiaro_del @MarcBesselink https://t.co/x8waod12xr
Fukuoka 2017 @pancreatology@SalviaRobi https://t.co/PaEYljt5N9
Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms (MCN)
Characterized by mucinous epithelium and ovarian-type stroma, in body/tail
It is described as macrocystic, septated cyst with small number of cavities, it may have eccentric calcifications, no connection to ductal system
95% women, 5-7th decades
MCN:
>risk malignancy:
≥5cm
Nodules/mass
Thickened/irregular Wall
Calcifications
Management of MCN according to the European guidelines: a conservative approach is recommended for asymptomatic MCN measuring <40 mm without an enhancing nodule
https://t.co/x8waod12xr
@chiaro_del @MarcBesselink @Gut_BMJ
Serous cystic neoplasm (SCN). Cuboidal epithelium without dysplasia
70% women, 5-7th decades, NON-MUCINOUS solitary lesion
Classic SCN is microcystic (multiple small cysts, honeycomb-like) but can be macrocystic or solid. A central scar or calcification can be present
SCN management: remove only if symptoms, for example this case from @Dhgua, the patient had jaundice due to a a massive SCN, a Whipple procedure was performed
Cystic neuroendocrine tumor
It is a pancreatic NET with a central cystic changes. Solitary lesion, 5-6th decades, frequently with wall contrast enhancement, 10% malignant potential
Cystic neuroendocrine tumor management: asymptomatic and <2 cm you may follow the patient https://t.co/8EhhAet35T
It seems that these cystic NET are less aggressive than solid NET
Finally,solid pseudopapillary neoplasm
They have malignant potential(15%), >risk if >5 cm
Young women=90% (2-3rd decades),body/tail.Solid and cystic solitary masses, calcifications,often with intracystic bleeding.They can spread to the peritoneum or distant organs like the liver
This twitter thread was based on:
https://t.co/dAuGI0qzLK
https://t.co/x8waod12xr
https://t.co/Ywp7zQF2wE
And Pancreatic cystic neoplasms, several articles from @UpToDate Editors: JR Saltzman S Grover Authors: Asif Khalid, MDKevin McGrath, MD https://t.co/nYN3MKTnl8
If you liked this twitter thread, please retweet the first tweet and follow me! #PancreasTwitter

I hope you enjoyed it, it took me a lot of effort to do this! 😅
@drdalbir @BilalMohammadMD @KralJan @drkeithsiau @MZorniak @DCharabaty @RashidLui @SunilAminMD @SanchezLunaMD @stevenbollipo @Samir_Grover @RishadJkhan @drmoutaz @RodriguezParra_

More from Health

No-regret #hydrogen:
Charting early steps for H₂ infrastructure in Europe.

👉Summary of conclusions of a new study by @AgoraEW @AFRY_global @Ma_Deutsch @gnievchenko (1/17)
https://t.co/YA50FA57Em


The idea behind this study is that future hydrogen demand is highly uncertain and we don’t want to spend tens of billions of euros to repurpose a network which won’t be needed. For instance, hydrogen in ground transport is a hotly debated topic
https://t.co/RlnqDYVzpr (2/17)

Similar things can be said about heat. 40% of today’s industrial natural gas use in the EU goes to heat below 100°C and therefore is within range of electric heat pumps – whose performance factors far exceed 100%. (3/17)


Even for higher temperatures, a range of power-to-heat (PtH) options can be more energy-efficient than hydrogen and should be considered first. Available PtH technologies can cover all temperature levels needed in industrial production (e.g. electric arc furnace: 3500°C). (4/17)


In our view, hydrogen use for feedstock and chemical reactions is the only inescapable source of industrial hydrogen demand in Europe that does not lend itself to electrification. Examples include ammonia, steel, and petrochemical industries. (5/17)
Thread on how atheism leads to mental retardation (backed with medical citations🧵💉)

To start with, atheism is an unnatural self-contradicting doctrine.

Medical terminology proves that human beings are naturally pre-disposed to believe in God. Oxford scientists assert that people are "born believers".

https://t.co/kE0Fi588yn
https://t.co/OqyXcGIMJn


It should be known that atheism could never produce an intelligently-functioning society and neither ever will.

Contrastingly, Islam produced several intellectuals & polymaths, was on the forefront of scientific development, boasting 100% literacy


It is also scientifically proven that atheism led to lesser scientific curiosity and scientific frauds, which is also why atheists incline to pseudo-science.

Whereas, religion in general and Islam in particular boosted education.

https://t.co/19Onc84u3g


Atheists are also likely to affected by pervasive mental and developmental disorders like high-functioning autism.

Cognitive Scientists and renowned Neurologists found that more atheism is leads to greater autism.

https://t.co/zRjEyFoX3P
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 1/ The 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 government decided pediatric gender care in England would be a monopoly contract (a Labour minister, in 2008), despite all other NHS patients officially being entitled to a choice of providers, & second opinions on diagnoses & treatment, & gave it to GIDS, which has…

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 2/…always advocated that trans minors & their families must have no alternative source of care, & subsequent Tory ministers have personally put their signature on renewals of it, and even personally rejected proposals for improvement that have been put forward by NHS England…

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 3/…as a result of wider & public consultation. They & their civil servants listen only to GIDS on trans minors - it was GIDS advised against <18s being allowed #GenderRecognition in 2004, & since, on the basis that no one under 18 can be certain of their gender identity, just…

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 4/…as many other staff at their trust wrote⬇️ to the press in 2002 (when the first instigator of this case, psychoanalyst Susan Evans was on staff too) that no trans people should be allowed that recognition but needed

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 5/…to "cure" us instead. Yet GIDS proved incapable of defending its super-conservative protocol in court - no doubt because GIDS has always expected challenges to be from patients seeking care more like that elsewhere, arrogantly ignoring that services in countries where the…
Some thoughts on this: Firstly, it might be personal preference, but I am not keen on this kind of campaign as I feel like it trivialises cancer. Sometimes the serious message gets lost because people are sharing pics of cats or whatever and the important context is gone.


More importantly, the statistic being used in the campaign is misleading. It says 57% of women put off cervical screening if they can't get waxed. But on further investigation, that's not accurate.

The page here goes on to say "57% of women who regularly have their pubic hair professionally removed would put off attending their cervical screening appointment if they hadn’t been able to visit a beauty salon."

So the 57% represents a concern not across the whole population of women, but only those who regularly get waxed. So how big of an issue is this across the whole population? And what else is stopping people getting smears?

I think campaigns for cancer screening are really tricky because there is so much nuance that often doesn't fit into a catchy headline or hashtag. It's certainly not easy and is part of a bigger conversation.

You May Also Like