The cor*na hoax thread. How and why, best as I can tell. First, how does the new virus work? The vast majority of cases are asymptomatic or indistinguishable from the common cold. A small minority of cases affect the lungs. But how it does should be clarified...

The virus doesn't cause pneumonia. Was often mistaken for pneu. at first, but doesn't cause the lungs to fill with fluid. Nor does it cause the failure of the lungs to pump; rather, it impairs the lungs' ability to absorb oxygen on a cellular level...
It also seems like it never fully destroys the lungs' ability to do this. From personal friends who've developed severe illness, like "having someone sitting on your chest". But I've never heard of a single cor*na death attributed to brain death due to no oxygen...
Rather, the stress caused by low oxygen makes some other organ "pop" first. The media is very vague on how it kills you, because you might start to put two and two together. That organ is almost always the heart. Lowered oxygen causes elevated heart rates. Sound familiar?
Yeah. The effects of the new virus on the body are indistinguishable from... moderate aerobic exercise. The only people who've died from the virus are -those who a light jog would kill-. What category is that? Does the data bear me out?
Well, just about the only people who would die from moderate exercise are people who were going to die shortly anyway. And guess what, according to the now-cancelled Johns Hopkins data analysis, every rona death corresponds with an expected "old age" death that didn't happen
1500 rona deaths in a state in a month corresponds exactly to heart attack, stroke, cancer deaths being down 1500 for that place and time. Not killing the grandmas who have a year to live, killing people who have two weeks to live
Social security payouts, April excepted, and we will get to April, are no lower than expected. SS does not pay out to dead people. Either all fake, or rona deaths are of people who would have died that month anyway.
So, why? What happened? How was the hoax perpetrated? In Nov19, China saw some cases of anomalous "pneumonia". Guesswork here, but they probably quickly determined that the new virus was not a threat. But, because the symptoms are scary, could be a very useful political tool
After that decision was made, they staged a fake lockdown, complete with overdramatic measures like sprayer trucks and hazmat suits, construction of fake hospitals (by now put to some other purpose no doubt) and only then told the WHO that they had a pandemic on their hands.
Initial political response to the virus in the west was mixed and confused, mostly correctly dismissive, until the scripts changed overnight on some central order, and the media started blasting full on panic. Blue empire was all on script, indicating central command...
...while red empire was not receiving any kind of marching order, continued to be confused. The new virus had been on our shores since dec19, everyone has a story about a weird flu from then, but only started producing deaths in Mar20.
Several blue state governors, under immense pressure to produce patients and deaths, began putting virus patients in nursing homes, and in April we do see a dip in SS payouts, actual excess deaths, which were gone by May, when the weak they could kill were killed.

More from Health

You gotta think about this one carefully!

Imagine you go to the doctor and get tested for a rare disease (only 1 in 10,000 people get it.)

The test is 99% effective in detecting both sick and healthy people.

Your test comes back positive.

Are you really sick? Explain below 👇

The most complete answer from every reply so far is from Dr. Lena. Thanks for taking the time and going through


You can get the answer using Bayes' theorem, but let's try to come up with it in a different —maybe more intuitive— way.

👇


Here is what we know:

- Out of 10,000 people, 1 is sick
- Out of 100 sick people, 99 test positive
- Out of 100 healthy people, 99 test negative

Assuming 1 million people take the test (including you):

- 100 of them are sick
- 999,900 of them are healthy

👇

Let's now test both groups, starting with the 100 people sick:

▫️ 99 of them will be diagnosed (correctly) as sick (99%)

▫️ 1 of them is going to be diagnosed (incorrectly) as healthy (1%)

👇

You May Also Like

My top 10 tweets of the year

A thread 👇

https://t.co/xj4js6shhy


https://t.co/b81zoW6u1d


https://t.co/1147it02zs


https://t.co/A7XCU5fC2m