Just got off the phone with a client who hasn’t been able to call because the jail has been taking his money for his meds.

In jail pretrial, they won’t continue you on any medicine you were on previously. You are abruptly taken off because you aren’t allowed to take your meds.

No regard for what abrupt discontinuation of meds will do (from what I’ve seen can range from delusions, delirium, psychosis, suicidal thoughts to actual suicide.) You stay like this while waiting to see medical which can take 20 days- month(s). Longest I’ve seen was 3 months.
After seeing medical, your scripts are often changed to different brands, doses reduced, and only administered once a week. So if you were prescribed something for bipolar— you’d get your one (smaller different brand) dose once a week.
You are then billed for that visit to medical + that medicine that’s administered once a week which is deducted from any money you have in your commissary. Then whatever remains is an open bill which will be taken should your family put more money on your books.
Your commissary is the only money you can access in jail— not only is this how you call home, how you video visit during a pandemic (because in person isn’t allowed), how you get utensils, paper, etc. to write home, but also how you buy necessities that the jail doesn’t provide
Like— soap, yes you have to buy your own soap in jail. They do not provide you soap. Soap, toilet paper, shampoo, tampons, conditioner, deodorant, shower shoes (in that nasty ass shower), etc. You won’t be able to bathe or wipe your ass without your family putting in money
It’s truly messed up that someone can be detained pretrial, have their own meds that were provided by a doctor according to their needs and paid for, but because they are in jail, they have to see a medic that they have to pay for to get new meds that they have to pay for
Money aside, the horrors I have seen with this — with switch people’s meds, not giving them the needed dose, and only giving a “top off” dose once a week or once every two weeks. You see people who are TRULY mentally disabled having mental episodes because of this
I’ve had clients that by months of this abuse In court they couldn’t speak, were curled in a ball on the ground, didn’t know their name, shaking and crying, seeing things, where even the bailiffs and guards were begging me to get them out because it was so bad for them inside.
There are so many issues with this but this is also why you don’t call the police when you see someone having a mental episode. They will not be helped in jail. In fact that is absolutely one of the places that they will be made worse.
Dont expect humanity from a system that has none to give. Don’t send your mentally ill or your addicted there.
Every client I’ve had that died by suicide while incarcerated was having severe DTs due without any medical treatment whatsoever(it takes at least 20-30 to see medical)
No one should be in jail but specifically no one mentally ill should be in jail. Prison exacerbates mental illness symptoms. What I see at the beginning compared to what I see in a months time in court is shocking and heartbreaking what this system does to our mentally ill.
And anyone who knows anything about mental illness, medicine regulation, and how hard it is to achieve that... should be horrified that the system is treating people with diagnosed mental illnesses this way, people who come in with medicine or have families that drop off medicine
Only to be ignored by the jail, ignored, and medicated once every 2 weeks maybe with a different dosage — it’s the bare minimum to be able to say they are providing mental health care when ruled in before the judge at our request.
Another issue I’ve run into after clients were abruptly taken off their meds and thrown into shock is often they are not fit (physically, mentally, or psychologically) to take a plea or make any decisions in their case. More often than not, they were at initial meeting with me
But after the shock of discontinuing their meds, they aren’t any longer. Then decisions have to be made but any of these decisions all involve more time in jail, even when a credit for time served plea is on the table because they aren’t fit to take it. All due to the jail. Bs
An example of this was a client that was taking a CFTS plea, during the plea colloquy was seeing things (he told me he was) and he was obviously getting nervous, nervously looking around in horror. The judge asked him why he did what he did- he said he saw the devil
Then to explain what he meant said I see things right now you have horns. The judge convinced he was just acting up despite my objections and insistence he wasn’t, sent him back to the jail and reset for 3 months later.
When I insisted to the judge that the jail took him off his meds and this was the result, he demanded I file a sanity which at minimum takes 6 months. All this Despite having a credit for time served plea on the table where this client gets out. All this because the jail.
Either way the client was now forced to be in jail at least 3 months-6 months despite being able to leave that very day.

No one could extend him even an ounce of humanity, a crumb of empathy, nothing.
When I referenced “sanity” above I was referencing a tool used to determine whether a defendant is competent to proceed and has the capacity to understand the proceedings against him or to assist in his defense.
When these clients are taken off their meds and come into court wanting to take a plea, even with a plea on the table, the court can choose to not take the plea, and order a “sanity commission” be formed to determine whether they are competent to take the plea.
At which the court won’t accept their plea (won’t allow them to plea) and has ordered the sanity so they have to go back to jail for the 6 months (at minimum) for a sanity to be completed.
After the determination is made by the sanity, if he’s determined to be competent he can then take his plea. But by this point he’s been in jail for an extra 6 months on top of the previous 3-5 he already had. This is done so clients plea can’t be overturned later.
It’s all terribly sad. Client comes in competent, jail takes off meds and renders him less competent, longer he waits the worse it gets, gets to court after 3-4 months, judge refuses get out of jail plea because maybe incompetent, gets 6 month test, finds competent, pleas to same
Endorsement by fellow public defender: https://t.co/VMIDjr3BKA

More from Health

@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 1/ The 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 government decided pediatric gender care in England would be a monopoly contract (a Labour minister, in 2008), despite all other NHS patients officially being entitled to a choice of providers, & second opinions on diagnoses & treatment, & gave it to GIDS, which has…

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 2/…always advocated that trans minors & their families must have no alternative source of care, & subsequent Tory ministers have personally put their signature on renewals of it, and even personally rejected proposals for improvement that have been put forward by NHS England…

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 3/…as a result of wider & public consultation. They & their civil servants listen only to GIDS on trans minors - it was GIDS advised against <18s being allowed #GenderRecognition in 2004, & since, on the basis that no one under 18 can be certain of their gender identity, just…

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 4/…as many other staff at their trust wrote⬇️ to the press in 2002 (when the first instigator of this case, psychoanalyst Susan Evans was on staff too) that no trans people should be allowed that recognition but needed

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 5/…to "cure" us instead. Yet GIDS proved incapable of defending its super-conservative protocol in court - no doubt because GIDS has always expected challenges to be from patients seeking care more like that elsewhere, arrogantly ignoring that services in countries where the…
No-regret #hydrogen:
Charting early steps for H₂ infrastructure in Europe.

👉Summary of conclusions of a new study by @AgoraEW @AFRY_global @Ma_Deutsch @gnievchenko (1/17)
https://t.co/YA50FA57Em


The idea behind this study is that future hydrogen demand is highly uncertain and we don’t want to spend tens of billions of euros to repurpose a network which won’t be needed. For instance, hydrogen in ground transport is a hotly debated topic
https://t.co/RlnqDYVzpr (2/17)

Similar things can be said about heat. 40% of today’s industrial natural gas use in the EU goes to heat below 100°C and therefore is within range of electric heat pumps – whose performance factors far exceed 100%. (3/17)


Even for higher temperatures, a range of power-to-heat (PtH) options can be more energy-efficient than hydrogen and should be considered first. Available PtH technologies can cover all temperature levels needed in industrial production (e.g. electric arc furnace: 3500°C). (4/17)


In our view, hydrogen use for feedstock and chemical reactions is the only inescapable source of industrial hydrogen demand in Europe that does not lend itself to electrification. Examples include ammonia, steel, and petrochemical industries. (5/17)
Some thoughts on this: Firstly, it might be personal preference, but I am not keen on this kind of campaign as I feel like it trivialises cancer. Sometimes the serious message gets lost because people are sharing pics of cats or whatever and the important context is gone.


More importantly, the statistic being used in the campaign is misleading. It says 57% of women put off cervical screening if they can't get waxed. But on further investigation, that's not accurate.

The page here goes on to say "57% of women who regularly have their pubic hair professionally removed would put off attending their cervical screening appointment if they hadn’t been able to visit a beauty salon."

So the 57% represents a concern not across the whole population of women, but only those who regularly get waxed. So how big of an issue is this across the whole population? And what else is stopping people getting smears?

I think campaigns for cancer screening are really tricky because there is so much nuance that often doesn't fit into a catchy headline or hashtag. It's certainly not easy and is part of a bigger conversation.

You May Also Like

क्या आप जानते हैं कि क्या है, पितृ पक्ष में कौवे को खाना देने के पीछे का वैज्ञानिक कारण!

श्राद्ध पक्ष में कौओं का बड़ा ही महत्व है। कहते है कौआ यम का प्रतीक है, यदि आपके हाथों दिया गया भोजन ग्रहण कर ले, तो ऐसा माना जाता है कि पितरों की कृपा आपके ऊपर है और वे आपसे ख़ुश है।


कुछ लोग कहते हैं की व्यक्ति मरकर सबसे पहले कौवे के रूप में जन्म लेता है और उसे खाना खिलाने से वह भोजन पितरों को मिलता है

शायद हम सबने अपने घर के किसी बड़े बुज़ुर्ग, किसी पंडित या ज्योतिषाचार्य से ये सुना होगा। वे अनगिनत किस्से सुनाएंगे, कहेंगे बड़े बुज़ुर्ग कह गए इसीलिए ऐसा करना

शायद ही हमें कोई इसके पीछे का वैज्ञानिक कारण बता सके।

हमारे ऋषि मुनि और पौराणिक काल में रहने वाले लोग मुर्ख नहीं थे! कभी सोचियेगा कौवों को पितृ पक्ष में खिलाई खीर हमारे पूर्वजों तक कैसे पहुंचेगी?

हमारे ऋषि मुनि विद्वान थे, वे जो बात करते या कहते थे उसके पीछे कोई न कोई वैज्ञानिक कारण छुपा होता था।

एक बहुत रोचक तथ्य है पितृ पक्ष, भादो( भाद्रपद) प्रकृति और काक के बीच।

एक बात जो कह सकते कि हम सब ने स्वतः उग आये पीपल या बरगद का पेड़/ पौधा किसी न किसी दीवार, पुरानी

इमारत, पर्वत या अट्टालिकाओं पर ज़रूर देखा होगा। देखा है न?

ज़रा सोचिये पीपल या बरगद की बीज कैसे पहुंचे होंगे वहाँ तक? इनके बीज इतने हल्के भी नहीं होते के हवा उन्हें उड़ाके ले जा सके।