https://t.co/n7fagVLYm0
We assembled two mammalian expression vectors and one DNA cassette inserted into African Swine Fever from PRJNA607174! What happened in GuangDong at Mar-Aug 2019???!

The legitimacy of those “samples”—completely destroyed. The CoV-like sequences—cloned. No data from the pCoV group should ever be trusted in any way anymore!
Note: the DNA cassette exist in both unintegrated and integrated forms. Likely using homology-directed recombination. Whatever they were trying to express it is not just one or two proteins. There were also SV40 Ori which is yet to be properly mapped.
https://t.co/O1FYnwX6Oj
Why you need expression vectors in VERO since these cells are never used as expression hosts? Especially since there were a load of different tags on these vectors. The proteins had novel tags both N and C, IgK, His, Myc—especially His tag. This is for
NiNTA purification. There is no way that anyone would tag a protein this way and only use it to transfect VERO cells. There are no other host cells in these datasets other than Manis Javanica. Only Manis Javanica and Chlorocebus Aethiops. VERO is never used for recombinant
Protein production, and there were no pigs in the dataset. Vectors therefore intended for Manis Javanica cells. This mean that the GD pangolins were intentionalally transfected with expression vectors and inoculated with recombinant ASFV expressing most likely CoV antigens.
GFP can’t even pass through the secretion pathway—why fuse that behind an IGk secretion signal?
SV40 pA.
Did they GFP-tag some of these proteins and make a recombinant ASFV just to make up the symptoms and histopathology? Very likely!
ASFV particles are found in Double-membraned vesicles when assembled, ASFV particles with GFP tagging glows green granularly in tissue, ASFV causes pneumonia and thromboembolism—it is the perfect body double for a fake CoV in all and every “supporting picture” they made!
Inoculate with rASFV. Mix in some CoV pEASY-T1 clones. Add in pcDNA3.1+/SV40pA-S-E-M-N. You get the perfect fake sample for a fake CoV!
@DrLiMengYAN1
Why there were no 5’- and 3’- sequence for MP789? The SRA had these junctions erased.
So to not be immediately obvious. But the other vector backbone sequences were left behind.
Synthetic sequences invalidate the supposed origin of the samples. Either Reused VERO stock or clone-derived sequences created the trace CoV reads.

More from Health

You gotta think about this one carefully!

Imagine you go to the doctor and get tested for a rare disease (only 1 in 10,000 people get it.)

The test is 99% effective in detecting both sick and healthy people.

Your test comes back positive.

Are you really sick? Explain below 👇

The most complete answer from every reply so far is from Dr. Lena. Thanks for taking the time and going through


You can get the answer using Bayes' theorem, but let's try to come up with it in a different —maybe more intuitive— way.

👇


Here is what we know:

- Out of 10,000 people, 1 is sick
- Out of 100 sick people, 99 test positive
- Out of 100 healthy people, 99 test negative

Assuming 1 million people take the test (including you):

- 100 of them are sick
- 999,900 of them are healthy

👇

Let's now test both groups, starting with the 100 people sick:

▫️ 99 of them will be diagnosed (correctly) as sick (99%)

▫️ 1 of them is going to be diagnosed (incorrectly) as healthy (1%)

👇

You May Also Like