A physician colleague's insurance will not cover her anti-nausea medicine (Zofran/ondansetron) for her CHEMO. It is $280.40 cash for 30 pills at Walgreen's. I logged into a physician/hospital medical supply company and can buy 30 pills for $3.30. That's an 8500% markup. 1/

It is easy to be angry at the insurance company bc Zofran is a well-known therapy for chemo-induced nausea and it should absolutely be covered. However, I'm sure Walgreen's buys in bulk and gets it for even less than $3.30. Add in labor, plastic bottle and charge $25. 2/
Retail pharmacies make an absolute killing, especially on cash-pay patients. Some pharmacies will offer a cash discount. However, in some states, pharmacists are not allowed to tell patients if the cash price is lower than their insurance co-pay. This is absolutely criminal. 3/
Medicaid negotiates with drug companies. For example, if you had asthma prior to 2016, Medicaid would cover brand-name Xopenex inhalers but not generic albuterol. So, we would have to write prescriptions for an expensive drug the patient didn't need so it would be free. 4/
How are emergency room physicians supposed to remember what drugs are on Medicaid's formulary, let alone all of private insurance? But how frustrating to be a patient and take in a prescription your doctor thinks you need only to find out it isn't affordable. 5/
Emergency physicians are shift workers. Then the pharmacy calls and asks for the doc who wrote the Rx to see if they can substitute something else. But that doc is home sleeping to return in 12 hr and the new doc is busy seeing her own pts, plus she doesn't want the liability. 6/
The patient is angry, the doctor is frustrated, and the pharmacist is busy because there's a line out the door and the doctor is in on a code blue so he's on hold. All of this could be avoided if prescription drugs were covered equally by all insurance. 7/
So, realize when you see an ER physician "on the phone," we jump through a ton of unnecessary hoops trying to do the right thing. There is much wasted time on red tape that cannot be done by the clerk. And we worry you won't ever get your prescription filled at all. 8/
Because if you don't, and your infection gets worse, we know you'll be back and then we've just doubled our work. You'll probably be sick enough for admission but there aren't any beds. 9/
So you'll wait in the ER and we'll avoid eye contact the 9 hrs you're there feeling like we've failed you. But you belong to the upstairs team now. And we did everything we could. How could we have known? A $20,000 hospital stay bc your $10 antibiotic was priced at $300. /End
Also realize that we are not supposed to know what kind of insurance you have or if you even have insurance. And it feels kinda unethical to ask because we treat everyone in the ER. It's not easily accessible in your chart. However, the most worthless Rx is the one never filled.

More from Health

@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 1/ The 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 government decided pediatric gender care in England would be a monopoly contract (a Labour minister, in 2008), despite all other NHS patients officially being entitled to a choice of providers, & second opinions on diagnoses & treatment, & gave it to GIDS, which has…

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 2/…always advocated that trans minors & their families must have no alternative source of care, & subsequent Tory ministers have personally put their signature on renewals of it, and even personally rejected proposals for improvement that have been put forward by NHS England…

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 3/…as a result of wider & public consultation. They & their civil servants listen only to GIDS on trans minors - it was GIDS advised against <18s being allowed #GenderRecognition in 2004, & since, on the basis that no one under 18 can be certain of their gender identity, just…

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 4/…as many other staff at their trust wrote⬇️ to the press in 2002 (when the first instigator of this case, psychoanalyst Susan Evans was on staff too) that no trans people should be allowed that recognition but needed

@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 5/…to "cure" us instead. Yet GIDS proved incapable of defending its super-conservative protocol in court - no doubt because GIDS has always expected challenges to be from patients seeking care more like that elsewhere, arrogantly ignoring that services in countries where the…
I applaud the #EUCancerPlan *BUT* caution: putting #meat 🥩 (a nourishing, evolutionary food) in the same box as 🚬 to solve a contemporary health challenge, would be basing policy on assumptions rather than robust data.

#FollowTheScience yes, but not just part of it!
THREAD👇


1/ Granted, some studies have pointed to ASSOCIATIONS of HIGH intake of red & processed meats with (slightly!) increased colorectal cancer incidence. Also, @WHO/IARC is often mentioned in support (usually hyperbolically so).

But, let’s have a closer look at all this! 🔍


2/ First, meat being “associated” with cancer is very different from stating that meat CAUSES cancer.

Unwarranted use of causal language is widespread in nutritional sciences, posing a systemic problem & undermining credibility.

3/ That’s because observational data are CONFOUNDED (even after statistical adjustment).

Healthy user bias is a major problem. Healthy middle classes are TOLD to eat less red meat (due to historical rather than rational reasons, cf link). So, they

4/ What’s captured here is sociology, not physiology.

Health-focused Westerners eat less red meat, whereas those who don’t adhere to dietary advice tend to have unhealthier lifestyles.

That tells us very little about meat AS SUCH being responsible for disease.

You May Also Like