#HDFC Good to accumulate but momentum is missing https://t.co/zVBL1zkfcK

More from Pranay Prasun

#POWRGRID why we should avoid such setup even if it's making new high everytime 👇
#ITC Very low risk setup 👇 https://t.co/N5PhvdfCPs
#ASIANPAINT Shared monthly chart for reference 👇
~ Gave sell call near 3300
~ Good to add at below levels
2580 /2200 https://t.co/lRdCEfw7WD

More from Hdfc

IF #Nifty to go to 18850-19713 & more, heavy weights such as
#Hdfc (3190++)
#Hdfcbank (1724++)
#Reliance (2834++)
#ITC (274++) these are "just min. targets"
& many more would move up significantly
@rlnarayanan https://t.co/iVYE1F7l6v

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?