Here’s newly-elected QAnon gun nut Rep. Boebert, the morning of the insurrection, referencing 1776.

Here she is that same morning, pushing lies about election fraud.
Here she is that morning calling on all of “us” (IE her fellow MAGAs) to “fight with everything” for a fair election to be achieved.
Here she is live-tweeting the location of members of Congress & the Speaker, as the mob invades the Capitol building. Either she has no regard for maintaining the safety of herself & her colleagues, or—not to start a conspiracy theory—she intentionally relayed info to rioters.
Here she is, after the attack ended, again evoking 1776.
Here she is, after insurrectionists attacked Congress & almost killed her colleagues over what they believe to be a rigged election, again pushing lies about election fraud.
Here she is evoking a call for “freedom”, days after a mob attacked Congress in the name of “freedom”.
Here she is, just a few hours ago, encouraging her followed to keep taking a stand. This, in the backdrop of numerous reports that there are more planned “marches” & “rallies” leading up to, & on, Inauguration Day, & as similar “demonstrations” are happening at State capitols.
Rep. Boebert is an elected member of Congress, responsible for upholding the Constitution to protect us & democracy, still actively inciting insurrection, & doing sedition. She is malicious, she is traitorous, she is dangerous. She needs to be expelled.
@Rschooley makes good points about Boebert & other seditious members of Congress in this thread: https://t.co/QAjADxRUib
More tweets from Boebert, going back to before the insurrection...Here she is calling for people to come to the sedition rally & “stand” with Trump.
LOL, this one I agree with.
Here she is saying her followers need to take back the country by not following the Democrats’ rules. (FYI, lady, they’re Congress’ rules.)
Here she is stoking the lie that Trump will be able to stay in office. She posted this a week before the insurrection, after the electors had already confirmed their votes.
Here she is praising fellow seditious members of Congress, & saying “history will never forget those who stand with the Constitution at this time”—a nod to the “patriots” who would come to DC & breach the Capitol under the belief they were defending the Constitution.
“Fighting for freedom” w Ted Cruz on Jan. 6th—takes on a different meaning now.
4 days before the insurrection, she’s following Trump’s cues & setting up Pence as the fall-guy, & implying it’s ok to not “have Pence’s back” if he doesn’t hand the election to Trump. (Something Pence never had the power to do.)
2 days before the insurrection, she’s suggesting our country will be in grave danger if people don’t “defend election integrity”. She may have meant the votes in Congress to object to the electoral college votes, but the post is a dog-whistle to the MAGA terrorists.
True. But also, in retrospect, inciting. (Whether intentionally or not. And knowing that she encouraged people to show up on Jan. 6th, this tweet from Jan. 4th seems awfully 🤨)
2 days before the insurrection, she implies that followers not back down when people tell them what they can & can’t do. And ties in the Founding Fathers & the “election integrity” fight.
I’m sure there’s other evidence of Boebert inciting & siding w the terrorists who attacked the Capitol. Like this statement she made on the floor as the mob moved in. (As has been pointed out by Watts, @Rschooley & others.) Bottom line, Boebert’s dangerous & needs to be expelled.
Missed this video she put out, after it was confirmed a cop was killed. In it, she gives a weak denouncement of the 1/6 violence, but also spews more lies about election fraud, & scares her followers w claims of Dems wanting to control every part of our lives. https://t.co/7I6aD3pHFV
Oh. I wonder which tyrants she was referring to? https://t.co/cKLPpOnPfz

More from Government

🧵⬇️1. Fb is LifeLog, LifeLog is Darpa, and DARPA is a Enterprise Run by CIA... Well... Past President... Big Tech, Big Pharma, MSM, HOLLYWOOD, DC...

Past Presidents....Zuckerberg, Gates...
All C_A... the Family business.... The company...


2. Past Presidents....Zuckerberg, Gates...
All C_A... the Family business.... The company...The Farm.... all C_A assets... most of them related by blood, business, or marriage...


3. "The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst." - J. Edgar Hoover


4. diff. names & faces.... Monsters that lurk in the Shadows. Swamp, Deep State, Establishment, Globalist Elite Cabal...

Shall we go back...How far back...


5. I know these monsters... it's when I try to explain them to others is when I run into a problem.This is why I'm better at retweeting and compiling. I never know where to start... Everytime I try to thread, i end up w/ a messy monstrous web.I'm better at helping others thread.
I don't normally do threads like this but I did want to provide some deeper thoughts on the below and why having a video game based on a real world war crime from the same people that received CIA funding isn't the best idea.

This will go pretty in depth FYI.


The core reason why I'm doing this thread is because:

1. It's clear the developers are marketing the game a certain way.

2. This is based on something that actually happened, a war crime no less. I don't have issues with shooter games in general ofc.

Firstly, It's important to acknowledge that the Iraq war was an illegal war, based on lies, a desire for regime change and control of resources in the region.

These were lies that people believed and still believe to this day.

It's also important to mention that the action taken by these aggressors is the reason there was a battle in Fallujah in the first place. People became resistance fighters because they were left with nothing but death and destruction all around them after the illegal invasion.

This is where one of the first red flags comes up.

The game is very much from an American point of view, as shown in the description.

When it mentions Iraqi civilians, it doesn't talk about them as victims, but mentions them as being pro US, fighting alongside them.

You May Also Like