To do this, I've split it into 4 categories:
👑Premium (MID & FWD above £9.5m)
💎Non-Premium (MID & FWD £9.4m - £6.2m)
💰Budget (MID & FWD below £6.2m)
⚔️Defenders
I've used the 10 highest scoring from each category📈
#FPL #FPLCommunity
2/20
🚨Analysis Thread🚨
As we've reached the half way point of the season, inspired by old posts on @FFScout & @KaramTayser I've done a half season analysis📊
This analysis will look at two things:
❤️Consistency v Explosiveness🔥
✅Reliability v Risk🚫
#FPL #FPLCommunity
1/20
To do this, I've split it into 4 categories:
👑Premium (MID & FWD above £9.5m)
💎Non-Premium (MID & FWD £9.4m - £6.2m)
💰Budget (MID & FWD below £6.2m)
⚔️Defenders
I've used the 10 highest scoring from each category📈
#FPL #FPLCommunity
2/20
First is Premium assets, looking at Consistency v Explosiveness for top 10 highest scorers. Games showing 1 & 2+ return & points.
Criteria to meet:
🔥 Explosive: ≥ 25% 2+ returns
❤️Consistent: ≥ 40% 1+ returns
❌Risky: ≥ 50% Blanks
#FPL #FPLCommunity
3/20
🇵🇹Bruno highest explosiveness
🦊Vardy 2nd
🛡️Kane & Son joint 3rd
🔥Kane 3 Legend hauls😍
🇧🇪KDB just meets explosive criteria
🧿Sterling most consistent
🇪🇬Salah very consistent
❌Rashford & Mane risky
❌Auba high risk
#FPL #FPLCommunity
4/20
Reliability v Risk, I look at how often the player made any return v blanking in the first half of the season.
Criteria to meet:
😍Very Reliable: ≥ 60% any returns
✅Reliable: 51-59% any returns
🚫Risky: ≥ 50% Blanks
#FPL #FPLCommunity
5/20
🛡️Kane most reliable - 72% return
❤️Salah, Vardy & Bruno all very reliable
🇰🇷Son reliable & explosive
✅KDB & Sterling reliable
👹Rashford borderline - 50/50 reliable & blank
🚫Mane & Auba risky
#FPL #FPLCommunity
6/20
Non-Premium assets for the top 10 highest scorers. Lower criteria threshold as cheaper assets.
Criteria to meet:
🔥 Explosive: ≥ 20% 2+ returns
❤️Consistent: ≥ 30% 1+ returns
❌Risky: ≥ 50% Blanks
#FPL #FPLCommunity
7/20
🔥Grealish only explosive player
❤️DCL extremely consistent
❤️Ings & Bamford high consistency
🇨🇮 Zaha risky but still explosive (just under 20%)
🦊Maddison consistent (lacked mins GW1-5)
❌JWP very risky
❌Barnes & Firmino risky
#FPL #FPLCommunity
8/20
Reliability v Risk, I look at how often the player made any return v blanking in the first half of the season.
Criteria to meet:
😍Very Reliable: ≥51% any returns
✅Reliable: 40-50% any returns
🚫Risky: ≥ 50% Blanks
#FPL #FPLCommunity
9/20
😍DCL most reliable - 75% returns
😍Ings & Bamford very reliable
✅Grealish was most explosive - 4th most reliable
✅Zaha & Maddison reliable (high blanks too🚫)
🚫JWP most risky
🚫Firmino & Barnes high risk
#FPL #FPLCommunity
10/20
Budget assets for the top 9 highest scorers & Gundogan. Lower criteria threshold as cheaper assets (£6.2m & below).
Criteria to meet:
🔥 Explosive: ≥ 10% 2+ returns
❤️Consistent: ≥ 30% 1+ returns
❌Risky: ≥ 65% Blanks
#FPL #FPLCommunity
11/20
🔥Watkins most explosive, but very high risk❌
🔥Fornals explosive & high risk❌
❤️Adams most consistent, Neto consistent too.
❤️Gundo, reliable & low games
🇨🇿Soucek reliable, but high blanks❌
❌Saka most blanks (AFC form good now)
#FPL #FPLCommunity
12/20
Reliability v Risk, I look at how often the player made any return v blanking in the first half of the season.
Criteria to meet:
😍Very Reliable: ≥40% any returns
✅Reliable: 30-39% any returns
🚫Risky: ≥ 65% Blanks
#FPL #FPLCommunity
13/20
😍Adams most reliable & consistent
😍Neto very reliable
✅Klich & Gundogan reliable
❌Watkins least reliable player
❌Fornals, Soucek & Saka most blanks
✅Arsenal hit form so Saka reliable recent weeks
#FPL #FPLCommunity
14/20
Looking at Consistency v Explosiveness for Defenders for the top 10 highest scorers. Returns include clean sheet & assist/goal
Criteria to meet:
🔥 Explosive: ≥ 10% 2+ returns
❤️Consistent: ≥ 40% 1+ returns
❌Risky: ≥ 50% Blanks
#FPL #FPLCommunity
15/20
🔥Zouma most explosive v appearances
🔥Robbo & Cresswell both explosive
🔥Robbo most explosive points returns
❤️Chilwell most consistent
❤️KWP & Dias very consistent
❌Justin highest blanks, but met explosive criteria
#FPL #FPLCommunity
16/20
Reliability v Risk, I look at how often the player made any return v blanking in the first half of the season.
Criteria to meet:
😍Very Reliable: ≥60% any returns
✅Reliable: 50-59% any returns
🚫Risky: ≥ 50% Blanks
#FPL #FPLCommunity
17/20
😍Chilwell most reliable defender
😍Dias & KWP next most reliable
✅Robbo & Cresswell joint 4th most reliable
✅Zouma most explosive but 6th most reliable
✅Bednarek, Dallas & Ogbonna reliable
🚫Justin most blanks & least reliable
#FPL #FPLCommunity
18/20
🔥Bruno most explosive
😍DCL most reliable
😍Kane explosive & reliable
🔥Grealish most explosive Non-Prem
😍Adams most reliable & consistent Budget
😍Chilwell most reliable DEF
❌Liverpool FWD risky bar Salah
❌Watkins not reliable
#FPL #FPLCommunity
19/20
A lot consistency & reliability cross over, but isn't necessarily the exact same. Overall the thread/charts convey decent info, but I will be looking to build upon this in an article in the coming days to flesh it out more.
#FPL #FPLCommunity
20/20
Hi guys, here's an analysis of consistency v explosiveness for 1st half of the season. Any help sharing/RT would be amazing❤️
Hi guys, here's an analysis of consistency v explosiveness for 1st half of the season. Any help sharing/RT would be amazing as a good bit of work gone into it❤️
More from For later read
Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).
Inside: Planet Money on HP's myriad ripoffs; Strength in numbers; and more!
Archived at: https://t.co/esjoT3u5Gr
#Pluralistic
1/
On Feb 22, I'm delivering a keynote address for the NISO Plus conference, "The day of the comet: what trustbusting means for digital manipulation."
https://t.co/Z84xicXhGg
2/
Planet Money on HP's myriad ripoffs: Ink-stained wretches of the world, unite!
https://t.co/k5ASdVUrC2
3/
Strength in numbers: The crisis in accounting.
https://t.co/DjfAfHWpNN
4/
#15yrsago Bad Samaritan family won’t return found expensive camera https://t.co/Rn9E5R1gtV
#10yrsago What does Libyan revolution mean for https://t.co/Jz28qHVhrV? https://t.co/dN1e4MxU4r
5/
Inside: Planet Money on HP's myriad ripoffs; Strength in numbers; and more!
Archived at: https://t.co/esjoT3u5Gr
#Pluralistic
1/
On Feb 22, I'm delivering a keynote address for the NISO Plus conference, "The day of the comet: what trustbusting means for digital manipulation."
https://t.co/Z84xicXhGg
2/
Planet Money on HP's myriad ripoffs: Ink-stained wretches of the world, unite!
https://t.co/k5ASdVUrC2
3/
Back in November, I published an article for @EFF about @HP's latest printer-ink ripoff: after offering its customers a free-ink-for-life plan, it unilaterally switched them all to a $1/month-for-life plan.https://t.co/bsc73xPSuo
— Cory Doctorow #BLM (@doctorow) February 18, 2021
1/ pic.twitter.com/tagduPupA5
Strength in numbers: The crisis in accounting.
https://t.co/DjfAfHWpNN
4/
Accountancy is more likely to be mocked than celebrated (or condemned), but accountants, far more than poets, are the unacknowledged legislators of the world.
— Cory Doctorow #BLM (@doctorow) February 18, 2021
1/ pic.twitter.com/FaNQc66gQN
#15yrsago Bad Samaritan family won’t return found expensive camera https://t.co/Rn9E5R1gtV
#10yrsago What does Libyan revolution mean for https://t.co/Jz28qHVhrV? https://t.co/dN1e4MxU4r
5/
#IDTwitter #IDFellows
Introducing our new series: “IDFN top 10 articles every fellow should read”🔖
#1: SAB management
by @mmcclean1 @LeMiguelChavez
Reviewers @KaBourgi, @IgeGeorgeMD, @Courtcita, @MDdreamchaser
We know is subjective & expect feedback/future improvements 👇
1. Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a review.
https://t.co/9tBCtp9mlP
👉 A must read written by Holland et al. where they review the evidence of the management of SAB.
2. Impact of Infectious Disease Consultation on Quality of Care, Mortality, and Length of Stay in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Results From a Large Multicenter Cohort Study.
https://t.co/XujO68pCuH
👉ID consult associated with reduced inpatient mortality.
3. Predicting Risk of Endocarditis Using a Clinical Tool (PREDICT): Scoring System to Guide Use of Echocardiography in the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
https://t.co/otcA1pxjAw
👉Predictive risk factors for infective endocarditis, and thus the need for TEE.
4. The Cefazolin Inoculum Effect Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.
https://t.co/CQZiryVWZz
👉Presence of cefazolin inoculum effect in the infecting isolate was associated with an increase 30-day mortality.
Introducing our new series: “IDFN top 10 articles every fellow should read”🔖
#1: SAB management
by @mmcclean1 @LeMiguelChavez
Reviewers @KaBourgi, @IgeGeorgeMD, @Courtcita, @MDdreamchaser
We know is subjective & expect feedback/future improvements 👇
1. Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a review.
https://t.co/9tBCtp9mlP
👉 A must read written by Holland et al. where they review the evidence of the management of SAB.
2. Impact of Infectious Disease Consultation on Quality of Care, Mortality, and Length of Stay in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Results From a Large Multicenter Cohort Study.
https://t.co/XujO68pCuH
👉ID consult associated with reduced inpatient mortality.
3. Predicting Risk of Endocarditis Using a Clinical Tool (PREDICT): Scoring System to Guide Use of Echocardiography in the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
https://t.co/otcA1pxjAw
👉Predictive risk factors for infective endocarditis, and thus the need for TEE.
4. The Cefazolin Inoculum Effect Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.
https://t.co/CQZiryVWZz
👉Presence of cefazolin inoculum effect in the infecting isolate was associated with an increase 30-day mortality.
You May Also Like
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
