On the issue of access to information for adopted persons #knowyouridentity, there are others who have more expertise in this than me but since I didn't get time to make all the points I would have liked to on @morningireland earlier, here are some thoughts (Thread ⬇️)

The previous AG advised that it would be unconst to provide an unlimited right to access info in leg - reasons were not given but we can presume this opinion is based on the result in the IOT vB case, which is a misreading of that case, while privacy was prioritised in that case
The SC indicated that this was an issue which should properly be dealt with by the Oir, which is entitled to conduct a balancing exercise and decide that one right should prevail over the other. The only prob would be if one set of rights was completely disregarded
Also, the weight of law and legal opinion is on the side of the right to know your identity, a CoA judgmnt last feb identified a right right to have your identity correctly recognised by the State and that was said to encompass a right to have a birth certificate and a passport.
The ECHR has recognised identity rights in respect of a variety of adoption information context & under EU law a person’s name is their personal data to which they have a right & personal data can lawfully be restricted only if there is clear legislation that allows for it
Which essentially means that the current situation where adopted people are being denied access to their own records is unconstitutional, contrary to the ECHR and contrary to EU Law.
It is also inconsistent since under the child and family relationships Act a child born through sperm donation has a legislative right to know there identity – yet this is still being denied to adoptive persons – this is arbitrary, unjust and discriminatory.
A referendum is not needed on this - @adoptionrights has a bill, drafted by @cmcgettrick @maeveorourke @maireadenright and @JamesGallen which properly addresses all these things and is ready to go
The Oireachtas knows all this already - people like @ConorUCCLaw and @ferguswryan contributed at pre-legislative stage in 2016 and laid all of this before the Justice Committee - handing it off to a citizens assembly etc would only cause further delay and hurt
Hopefully the new AG will review all of this and will agree with all of the legal experts who have written about and advocated for this. It is not as complicated as may first appear.
Oireachtas members - please engage with @clann_project and others and just legislate for this!

More from For later read

This response to my tweet is a common objection to targeted advertising.

@KevinCoates correct me if I'm wrong, but basic point seems to be that banning targeted ads will lower platform profits, but will mostly be beneficial for consumers.

Some counterpoints 👇


1) This assumes that consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones.

This does not seem self-evident to me


Research also finds that firms choose between ad. targeting vs. obtrusiveness 👇

If true, the right question is not whether consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones. But whether they prefer *more* contextual ads vs *fewer* targeted

2) True, many inframarginal platforms might simply shift to contextual ads.

But some might already be almost indifferent between direct & indirect monetization.

Hard to imagine that *none* of them will respond to reduced ad revenue with actual fees.

3) Policy debate seems to be moving from:

"Consumers are insufficiently informed to decide how they share their data."

To

"No one in their right mind would agree to highly targeted ads (e.g., those that mix data from multiple sources)."

IMO the latter statement is incorrect.

You May Also Like