BC FOR LATER READ
Saved by @CodyyyGardner

Choking on meat: A Thread

But what do the 'Mormons' really, Really, REALLY believe!?

 Recently I participated in a discussion with two very courteous and well intentioned men of another Christian faith who were trying to expose the challenges the church faces today. In our discussion we covered only two topics, but in a previous discussion they covered a number.
There was in insinuation that the church has secret teachings and a checkered past that its tried to hide for far too long, and that the jig is coming up - the truth is coming out - and members of the church are checking out.
Let me start by acknowledging there's some truth to that. There are elements of our history that are controversial. The church has been very guarded with elements of its history because of treatment we've faced in the past over them. So let's look at the merits of this case.
First, I think we should ask if there are ever times it's appropriate to withhold information.

To me, the scriptures and God's actions as a whole form a resounding yes.
"You need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God’s word all over again. You need milk, not solid food! ... solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil."

Paul wrote to the Hebrews.
Christ taught in parables to obscure the meaning of scripture from those who were unprepared to receive it.
The Lord taught through Isaiah,
Why is it that knowledge can be so dangerous? Why is information withheld by God from those who are unready to receive it? Well, for a number of reasons. Let's look at the resurrection.
When the Jewish leadership had Christ killed because they rejected Him as the messiah, Christ didn't show himself to them after His resurrection to prove to them they were wrong. The proof of His resurrection was withheld from them.
Christ in fact appeared only to a few chosen individuals relative to the population of the world that would depend on Him for salvation. He remains hidden from the world today, and He explains that reason to His disciples:
It comes back to faith. We are here in this life in part to build and demonstrate our faith (and by faith we mean belief that moves to righteous action). "You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder." says James.
Alma sheds additional light on why withholding knowledge from those not ready for it is a merciful act, asking "And now, how much more cursed is he that knoweth the will of God and doeth it not?"
For the Pharisees it was a mercy not to see the resurrected Lord, because even knowing their hard hearts would still have rejected Him, and they would have been all the more damned.
What other reasons are there for withholding meat? For safety. Christ taught the apostles that He withheld information from the general crowds because at the time they would not be safe if that information was known generally; the primary example being his true identity.
I think Paul's example of meat, or solid food compared to milk has a lot of meaning to draw from. How can meat hurt us? Why does it have to be served just right in order to benefit us?
Well meat can be served poorly seasoned which makes it unappetizing, all the way to being served raw. The way that it is served can make it nourishing and satisfying - fantastic even - or can make turn us away, make us sick, or even kill us.
Will Christ hold blameless those who serve up soured meat for others to eat? I don't think He will. When discussing abuse He makes a statement that seems to me also holds broader meaning:
Some seem to make a sport out of casting stumbling blocks, challenging each other who can lob the largest and the farthest. And, there are those who have made a profession out of it, being financially wedded to the neatly paved highways they create to lead people astray.
So lets look at some sour meat, and examine if it really holds up to the sniff test. We'll start with a favorite stone that critics love to lob, that 'Mormons' believe God had sex with Mary.
This is taken form the website of Mormonism Research Ministries and was written by Eric Johnson:
In the first place, it takes two separate teachings and tries to link them as one.
1. Our Heavenly Father is literally the Father of Christ
2. That Christ's creation must have been the product of a sexual union.
We believe the first point as a matter of doctrine, and I won't argue that. We believe that God the Father is the Father of Christ's body. He inherited divine attributes into the mortal body co-created by Mary. In modern terms we'd say that He has His dad's genes.
The second point though not only isn't our doctrine, but it conflicts with it. Speaking on the subject of speculation on doctrine for which we have no revelation to support, or which contradicts revelation we have received, Harold B. Lee taught:
Was Harold B. Lee the only one to teach this? No, Bruce R McConkie himself (whose statements are often put forth as evidence the we believe something we don't) made it plain that while we believe the Father begot Christ in the flesh it was not by a sexual act.
To this we need to add another caution. There are a number of quotes by Brigham Young that have been used over the years to bash the church over the head to misrepresent our beliefs. One of the fruits born out by the increased scholarship on our history has been to learn that /
Brigham's scribe George D. Watts made huge alterations to Brigham's writings that make the Journal of Discourses these quotes are often mined from an unreliable source for things Brigham Young actually said.
(See this article for examples: https://t.co/KHWZlBppSY)
It's a testament to John the beloved's prophetic wisdom in counseling the danger of altering prophetic utterances. How many problems could we have avoided if Watts had been accurate in recording Brigham's words? We'll never know.
How many problems could we avoid wasting ink and electrons defending those bad recordings of bad doctrine? Again, we're never going to know - but it shows the wisdom of the church in affirming what we've always affirmed - we believe the standard works and the living oracles.
This takes us to a larger question. Does it fairly represent the beliefs of the church to go dumpster diving for yesterday's spoiled teachings? If opinions of past leaders are left by the wayside do those opinions accurately represent what the church teaches and believes?
Or is it more accurate to recognize that those past teachings were left by the wayside because we as a church recognize they don't harmonize with out doctrine and that we rejected them long ago?
Here's the big secret- if you want to know what members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believes I'll give you the time and date of the super secret meeting where we teach it all. It happens in April and October and its broadcast free for all the world to hear.
Over the pulpit of today's general conferences you're going to hear every deep doctrine we teach of you're spiritually tuned to hear it. What are you not going to find? Past opinions that we as a church have discarded because they don't align with what God has revealed to us.
I think there has been a welcome maturing of the understanding we as a church have had as to the importance of avoiding speculation on doctrines we have no foundation for. There has always been the danger of seeking, as Paul says, knowledge that puffs up.
If you want to judge us as a church you don't need to jump back to the 1970's, or the 1930's or the 1850's. We believe that God will YET reveal many great and important things. We have grown as a church, as Isaiah said, line upon line and precept upon precept.
That's the beauty of a living church. We're not bound to the past instances of times we "saw through a glass darkly," the light of revelation continues to stream through the glass - and with each passing day we get a fuller, richer view of God's plan for His children.
I find it telling that our critics love to quote mine. In doing so they pass by mountains of prophetic teachings to pull out a pamphlet's worth of what they find objectionable. It's the same short stack of quotes every time. They're so focused on the 1% of what they see as bad /
that they miss the 99% of what we actually daily live and teach because it contradicts their narrative. When they pull our scriptures out of context they omit the surrounding verses that often answer the very objections they are raising.
There's a statement from Joseph Smith that I think is powerful: "Do you think that even Jesus, if He were here, would be without fault in your eyes? His enemies said all manner of evil against Him-they all watched for iniquity in Him."
Even in Jesus Christ, God Himself, the one perfect man to walk the earth, the Pharisees, Sadducee's, Scribes and rulers found fault - why? Because that's all they were looking for. Determined Christ was wrong, they sought and found proof that He wasn't messiah.
They strained at the gnat, and swallowed the camel whole.
Are we any less susceptible? If we're determined to find fault, even with Christ's true gospel (whatever version you may think that is) - can we create it where no fault exists?
"Your thoughts are not my thoughts" saith the Lord. If we are expecting to find the true gospel always and only to meet our own expectations we are setting ourselves in the role of God and asking that He conform His truth to us.
We have the duty to trust in the Lord with ALL our hearts, and lean not to our own understanding. In ALL OUR WAYS acknowledge Him, and HE - of we're truly faithful - HE will direct our paths.
May we all aspire to that blessing is my prayer in the name of Jesus Christ.
@UnrollHelper

More from For later read

truth_serum007
truth_serum007
@truth_serum_007
💥BOOM💥 Linn Wood!! They can't stop what is coming!
Chief Justice John Roberts must resign today. Over the past several weeks, I have met with a courageous whistleblower who has risked his life to tell you the truth. Jeffrey Epstein arranged for the...
Part 1.1
FOR LATER READ
Not Chris Nandor
Not Chris Nandor
@pudge_nandor
From @jack:

Starting now, we are changing the way we do things at Twitter. Even though we have been following policies we created, that we thought were good and necessary, it just hasn’t had the desired effect of promoting good discourse. Effective immediately, we are changing.

The basic principle that now guides us is that instead of trying to manipulate discourse, we are opening it up, and making ourselves more transparent and accountable, and resisting attempts at censorship of us or our users.

Further, we have been fundamentally operating under the false premise that we, our our news and fact-checking partners, are smarter or better at understanding information than you, our users, are. This is a vain fiction, and we will drop this pretense.

We have long known that we are not just another social media site, but the place where citizens, governments, and organizations communicate with each other, for essential purposes. We have a great responsibility to the public to be open. So, we change to improve.

First: we will no longer proactively delete any content, except for: private information harming a person other than who posted it (e.g. doxxing, revenge porn, etc.), and any content we are legally required to remove.
FOR LATER READ
Advertisement
Louisette Lanteigne \U0001f30e\u270c\ufe0f\u2696\ufe0f\u2665\ufe0f
Louisette Lanteigne 🌎✌...
@lulex
The public supports less policing and prisons but Harper invested in social discord.

Policing, Prison and construction were linked under the Harper Government.

Richard Bird was VP of Enbridge and he also served as a member of the Canada's Federal Minister of Finance's Advisory Committee on Financing and currently serves as chairman of the board of directors of the Alberta Investment Management

Richard Bird, a former VP of Enbridge is linked to Ecopatrol, missing money and a massive sex scandal in Colombia and Prison Schemes with bid rigging, corruption and collusion.

There was bid rigging corruption and collusion during Prime Minister Harper's term as they invested in private prisons across Canada. Read here. This mentions Bird Construction Inc. Richard Bird was VP of Enbridge Pipeline Inc.
FOR LATER READ
Holly | Alem
Holly | Alem
@alemiye_
I’ve been frustrated by the tweets I’ve seen of this as a Canadian. Because the facts are being misrepresented.

We’re not under some sort of major persecution. That’s not what this is. A thread. 1/8


This church was fined for breaking health orders in Dec. They continued to break them. So the pastor was arrested and released on conditions of... you guessed it, not breaking health orders. And then they broke the health orders. 2/8

So then he was arrested and told he couldn’t hold church services in person if he was to be released. He refused. He’s still in custody.

Here is my frustration as a Christian in Canada:

1. They were able to gather, with some conditions. They didn’t like those. 3/8

2. He is not actually unable to preach. He is just unable to hold church services because they broke the conditions given by the public health office in Alberta. He says he can’t in good conscience do that, so they are keeping him in jail (because he will break the law). 4/8

3. This is the 1st article of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: “guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” 5/8
FOR LATER READ
Jill Filipovic
Jill Filipovic
@JillFilipovic
This column by @ezraklein is very good and I agree with him 100% on policy -- we need a generous child allowance now. But I'm seeing this creeping argument on the left that it's just not important for women to work outside the home, and that's concerning.

Working 60 hours a week at two or three jobs? That's obviously awful. Being paid so poorly that you have no time for your family or leisure? That's not "dignity," that's exploitation. And it is single moms who bear the brunt of this.

But while the argument that at-home work is just as valuable as paid work may be morally correct, in our capitalist reality, not working outside of the home leaves women incredibly financially and physically vulnerable. It also leaves them isolated, depressed, and anxious.

wrote a whole book about this, but paid work is good for women. Not three jobs at $7.50 an hour to stay afloat. But work for pay, which offers a purpose outside of raising one's own children, and friends and coworkers and a $$ lifeline outside the nuclear family.

When women wind up financially dependent on men, good things do not follow. Of course there are individual stories of this working out just fine. But over the whole of a society, women as carers and men as earners is not a good system.
FOR LATER READ

You May Also Like

Michael King \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8
Michael King 🇺🇸...
@8MichaelKing
Ever notice how the top niches are centered around health, wealth, and relationships?

There's a deep-rooted psychological (and biological) reason why.

And today, I'm gonna to explain all of it so you can start profiting off of this knowledge 💰💰

*Now, this thread is going to be long and in depth. Make sure to favorite the top tweet now so you can come back to it later.

So. Down to the very core of every living being (humans, dolphins, bacteria, aliens), there are only two drivers:
1. To survive
2. To reproduce

Right off the bat, we know that sex is a primary driver to human behavior.

This would also mean that each gender has its own insecurities regarding sex.

Men have a subconscious fear that their woman will leave them for someone more successful

Women have a fear that their man will leave them for someone younger & better-looking

We can conclude that men are attracted to looks, and women are attracted to status.

This is human nature down to its very core.

Crazy, blue-haired feminists will try to argue and say otherwise.

But, 50 years of feminism DOES NOT OVERRIDE millions of years of evolutionary biology.

Here's a quick visualization exercise so you can see how true all this is...
STARTUPS
Dr. Thomas Binder, MD
Dr. Thomas Binder, MD
@Thomas_Binder
1/12

RT-PCR corona (test) scam

Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


2/12

It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


3/12

The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu


4/12

Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID


5/12

Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
CATEGORY C19
Advertisement
Savitri Mumukshu - \u0938\u093e\u0935\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u0941\u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0941
Savitri Mumukshu - साव...
@MumukshuSavitri
1/n
The kingdom of Sindh was ruled by its last Hindu king Raja Dahir during the 8th century. When Muhammad-bin-Qasim invaded Sindh, he decimated Sindh in his savage bloodlust. The chronicles of his advent are described in the Chachnama.


2/n
The Chachnama describes in detail how the Arabs led by butcher Qasim conquered Sindh. It tells the terrible tale of bravery, treachery, & carnage marking the entry of Islamic conquest of India’s Hindus.


3/n
When Muhammad-bin-Qasim attacked Sindh, Dahir had collected an army of 50,000 horses and marched from Brahamanabad to Rawar to face the invader. Qasim had an army that numbered in the tens of thousands with camels & horses.

4/n
Earlier Arab Alafis - Syeds from Prophet Mohammed’s own family had fled from Mecca with 500 men to Sindh and Raja Dahir had given them asylum. Trusting these Muslims would prove to be the fatal mistake for the downfall of Sindh & pave the way for Islamic invasion.

5/n
On an “auspicious day” in A.D. 711, fixed by astrologers, Mohammed Bin Qasim started for Sindh at the head of the Iraqi, Syrian, and other Arab soldiers. His horses and camels were disguised to look like lions and elephants. Rebel Jats also joined Qasim’s army.
ALL , GANDHARITIHAS
ashkan soltani
ashkan soltani
@ashk4n
BREAKING: @CommonsCMS @DamianCollins just released previously sealed #Six4Three @Facebook documents:

Some random interesting tidbits:

1) Zuck approves shutting down platform API access for Twitter's when Vine is released #competition


2) Facebook engineered ways to access user's call history w/o alerting users:

Team considered access to call history considered 'high PR risk' but 'growth team will charge ahead'. @Facebook created upgrade path to access data w/o subjecting users to Android permissions dialogue.


3) The above also confirms @kashhill and other's suspicion that call history was used to improve PYMK (People You May Know) suggestions and newsfeed rankings.

4) Docs also shed more light into @dseetharaman's story on @Facebook monitoring users' @Onavo VPN activity to determine what competitors to mimic or acquire in 2013.

https://t.co/PwiRIL3v9x
TECH
Jaya_Upadhyaya
Jaya_Upadhyaya
@Jayalko1
MEENAKSHI AMMAN, MADURAI (TN)
#bharatmandir #navratri2021

A paadal Petra sthalam where Shiva took the form of Sundareswarar (the handsome one) and married Devi Parvati (Meenakshi).
Devi is also known by the name Angayarkanni (mother with the beautiful fish eyes).
@GunduHuDuGa


Devi Meenakshi emerged from yagna fire as a 3 year old girl when Pandyan King Malayadwaja and Kanchanamalai were praying for a child.
It is said that Devi was born with three breasts and there was a prophesy that her superfluous breast would melt away when she met her husband.


Devi ruled over Madurai and captured Indralok. She went on to capture Kailasha. When she saw Shiva, her 3rd breast disappeared and she realised that Shiva would be her consort.
The divine marriage was attended by all Devas and Sri Vishnu (as her brother) gave her hand to Shiva.


It is said that Indra found a swayambhu lingam at Kadamba Vanam. He placed it in Madurai where the kshetram stands. Here, Shiva is seen on the vehicle of Indra.
The Golden Lotus Tank is said to be the place where a golden lotus blossomed for the puja performed by Indra.


The Meenakshi Thirukalyanam festival is celebrated in the Chithirai month to mark the divine marriage of Meenakshi Amman. The festival includes a procession where Meenakshi and Sundareshwara travel in a chariot and Sri Vishnu gives away his sister in marriage to Shiva.
ALL