1/14 Now that everyone and their mother is talking about $LUNA & $MIR my message is

We don't need the money

This is why

👇

2/14 Vast majority of crypto assets have insignificant or no adoption at all. The few with the highest adoption are at best very good speculation bets.
3/14 #Ethereum is the King of platforms and today there is no competition even close the liquidity and usage. All this activity is not reflected in $ETH itself and that is why EIP 1559, a proposal to change the economic model is a constant debate.
4/14 Looking at the $ETH example at this point we can conclude the ideal asset needs two important factors

1. Adoption
2. Good value capture

High adoption without a good value capture is not ideal and vice versa
5/14 @terra_money is one of the world's most highly adopted chains with millions of dollars in "real world transactions".

What does this mean and how is this aligned with $LUNA token holders?
6/14 Without getting in to technicals.

Every transaction on Terra collects a small fee that is paid out to $LUNA stake holders.
7/14 Being a stablecoins protocol with all the relevant currencies all minting will eventually put a hard burn pressure on $LUNA.
8/14 Terra platform is growing like nothing else in the crypto space

High usage = high rewards = high price
9/14 50k-100k users paying through the payment dapp #CHAI without knowing they are using blockchain have set a reward base for early investors (still very early)
10/14 Now with @mirror_protocol $MIR becoming the standard for tokenized stocks and other dapps in the making the reward base is getting higher
11/14 The value capture of $LUNA is perfectly aligned with stake holders

If you buy and stake, you take out $LUNA but also dilute our guaranteed rewards
12/14The burn happens anyways, with higher usage of dapps there is a:

higher demand for stablecoins--> higher rewards-->higher amount of $LUNA being burned--->higher $LUNA price
13/14 In bull or bear $LUNA holders are winning

The rewards are non-inflationary paid out in stablecoins
14/14 I hope i could slightly demonstrate how

$LUNA does not need your money

Stake holders are de facto owners of the Terra Protocol

Sharing $LUNA is like chopping parts of your successful business and giving it out to strangers

More from Finance

The Dutch regulator and DNB as financial supervisor are a tough cookie to deal with. In essence they hyperregulate EU-rules into goldplated Dutch rules which go beyond what is prescribed in Europe.

All NL-customers at British banks may thus be kicked out on brexit.

Thread

/1

If we start with the capital requirements directive, it says attracting deposits is forbidden. In article 9.

https://t.co/RYl7SXligC


Now the translation of that rule into Dutch law is slightly expanded to not only prohibit attracting deposits, but to also prohibit, having those deposits under custody ('ter beschikking hebben').

That's not in EU law, but it is in our Dutch law.

https://t.co/PsbWfNY3PA


So if you wonder how this would work out for UK banks and Payment institutions servicing Dutch customers. Have a read at the technical explanation of DNB, the financial supervisor and their summarising table.

https://t.co/LL0fAnYkRJ

Passive servicing of Dutch is not allowed!


Any bank or PSP in the UK that continues to serve Dutch customers (as in retail customers, professional players are excepted) can thus be subject to fines and policing under Dutch law.

Meaning we not only have Accidental American issues in payments, but also Accidental Dutchies

You May Also Like