The basics are that the enemy knows that he 👇
The Maoist struggle session is the only known end point for the traitors who will soon challenge us.
The time is coming when many of us will have to stand up to co-parents, school head teachers etc when they challenge us with what they know to be falsehoods.
The struggle👇
The basics are that the enemy knows that he 👇
The challenge that is coming, whether it is about vaccines being the only route to ‘herd immunity’ or how illness is spread by asymptomatic (healthy) people will one based on bogus scientific doctrine.
But do *not* focus on the untruths.👇
The traitors have also been trained to make you feel that you’re under observation. They will make 👇
Remember throughout any such episodes that you are watching a rehearsed performance. This is not a person in front of you.
You know the truth. 👇
Make sure that this is the *only* transaction you ever offer.
If you stick to the truth and are not 👇
Remember that the interaction is not with a person - it is with a programme. Once it runs through enough times without submission or provocation (engagement), it will stop.
Stand your ground calmly in self possession. 👇
More from Education
An appallingly tardy response to such an important element of reading - apologies. The growing recognition of fluency as the crucial developmental area for primary education is certainly encouraging helping us move away from the obsession with reading comprehension tests.
It is, as you suggest, a nuanced pedagogy with the tripartite algorithm of rate, accuracy and prosody at times conflating the landscape and often leading to an educational shrug of the shoulders, a convenient abdication of responsibility and a return to comprehension 'skills'.
Taking each element separately (but not hierarchically) may be helpful but always remembering that for fluency they occur simultaneously (not dissimilar to sentence structure, text structure and rhetoric in fluent writing).
Rate, or words-read-per-minute, is the easiest. Faster reading speeds are EVIDENCE of fluency development but attempting to 'teach' children(or anyone) to read faster is fallacious (Carver, 1985) and will result in processing deficit which in young readers will be catastrophic.
Reading rate is dependent upon eye-movements and cognitive processing development along with orthographic development (more on this later).
Sorry - a bit of a brain dump post - but I'd appreciate any responses and/or directions towards any applicable research.@Suchmo83 @Mr_AlmondED @TimRasinski1 @ReadingShanahan @mrspennyslater @TheReadingApe @PieCorbett @ReadingRockets @teach_well
— Mr Leyshon (@RyonWLeyshon) February 4, 2021
It is, as you suggest, a nuanced pedagogy with the tripartite algorithm of rate, accuracy and prosody at times conflating the landscape and often leading to an educational shrug of the shoulders, a convenient abdication of responsibility and a return to comprehension 'skills'.
Taking each element separately (but not hierarchically) may be helpful but always remembering that for fluency they occur simultaneously (not dissimilar to sentence structure, text structure and rhetoric in fluent writing).
Rate, or words-read-per-minute, is the easiest. Faster reading speeds are EVIDENCE of fluency development but attempting to 'teach' children(or anyone) to read faster is fallacious (Carver, 1985) and will result in processing deficit which in young readers will be catastrophic.
Reading rate is dependent upon eye-movements and cognitive processing development along with orthographic development (more on this later).
Our top 15 tweets
A #prodmgmt thread 👇
https://t.co/Yv854Sd3P3
https://t.co/sXaMH1bZ9m
https://t.co/5X7bOTsS7m
https://t.co/w1y6LTtPS2
A #prodmgmt thread 👇
https://t.co/Yv854Sd3P3
Sum up Product Management in 4 words or less. \U0001f609
— Product School (@productschool) April 10, 2020
https://t.co/sXaMH1bZ9m
\u201cWithout data, you\u2019re just another person with an opinion.\u201d
— Product School (@productschool) July 22, 2020
-W. Edwards Deming
https://t.co/5X7bOTsS7m
MVP (Minimum Viable Product) or MLP (Minimum Lovable Product)? \u2764\ufe0f
— Product School (@productschool) July 6, 2020
https://t.co/w1y6LTtPS2
UI/UX are not just add-ons for a product. They\u2019re critical elements that need care, research, and a Product Manager\u2019s full attention.
— Product School (@productschool) July 12, 2020
You asked. So here are my thoughts on how osteopathic medical students should respond to the NBOME.
(thread)
Look, even before the Step 2 CS cancellation, my DMs and email were flooded with messages from osteopathic medical students who are fed up with the NBOME.
There is *real* anger toward this organization. Honestly, more than I even heard about from MD students and the NBME.
The question is, will that sentiment translate into action?
Amorphous anger on social media is easy to ignore. But if that anger gets channeled into organized efforts to facilitate change, then improvements are possible.
This much should be clear: begging the NBOME to reconsider their Level 2-PE exam is a waste of your time.
Best case scenario, you’ll get another “town hall” meeting, a handful of platitudes, and some thoughtful beard stroking before being told that they’re keeping the exam.
Instead of complaining to the NBOME, here are a few things that are more likely to bring about real change.
(thread)
I think most of us are over here waiting to see what @jbcarmody has to say about the latest NBOME email pic.twitter.com/bVWkS23V7z
— Jake Berg (@jberg521) January 28, 2021
Look, even before the Step 2 CS cancellation, my DMs and email were flooded with messages from osteopathic medical students who are fed up with the NBOME.
There is *real* anger toward this organization. Honestly, more than I even heard about from MD students and the NBME.
The question is, will that sentiment translate into action?
Amorphous anger on social media is easy to ignore. But if that anger gets channeled into organized efforts to facilitate change, then improvements are possible.
This much should be clear: begging the NBOME to reconsider their Level 2-PE exam is a waste of your time.
Best case scenario, you’ll get another “town hall” meeting, a handful of platitudes, and some thoughtful beard stroking before being told that they’re keeping the exam.
Instead of complaining to the NBOME, here are a few things that are more likely to bring about real change.
