If I finish all of the physics a lesson or two before the end of term, I like to use those spare lessons to do something fun. For the last 12 years I have done a boys vs girls engineering challenge and the girls nearly always win. Here is why...

So, my experience of this is normally allowing 5 or so classes do this activity in any given year, always with the same set up and always with me observing just how it goes. In total I must now have observed the experiment about 60 times.
To be clear I am all for students choosing their own teams and such and I am aware of the false dichotomy of the situation. But generally due to sports, boarding houses etc my crew are quite used to boys as one gang and girls as another.
The activity is bridge building. Two tables are set apart and each team must bridge the gap using only paper, string and 4 clamp stands. The bridge must have a roadway and each will be tested to destruction at the end with weights.
So, I split the class - girls vs boys. The rules are clear. They can't interfere with each other's bridges and they can't test their own bridge. They have about 45 minutes to build something. Let me tell you what then normally happens...
On the boys team, the task starts with a battle for power. One or two will try in the first 30 seconds to become leader. Some try being louder than everyone else. Some use pre-existing loyalties to gain support and become leader. However this leadership is vulnerable...
The boy leader engages his followers in tasks. You cut string. You fold paper. That sort of thing. But then one of the boys will have a great idea. Something non of the rest have thought about. And he will take it to the leader.
But the leader misunderstands the idea and thinks that this person is challenging his leadership and ignores the idea. The idea boy tries to sell the idea to the group triggering rejection. Idea boy then disengages from the task. All of the good engineers do. They all sit down
The leader chooses his friends to do the work, picking his favourites to do the best jobs and ignoring those he doesn't know very well. They get disenfranchised. They don't know what to do and feel left out. So they disengage as well.
So what starts with 15 or so boys ends up being about 5 boys actually contributing and 10 boys feeling pushed out.
But the girls are different. A leader will emerge quickly. Some pre-existing understanding of who would be leader already exists. Either this or that more of the girls are quite happy not being the leader. But then, with the leader established, she does something remarkable....
She looks around and spots engineering girl and brings her right into the middle. "What should we do?". The leader platforms the idea girl and draws out of her a plan they can all follow. The leader silences everyone, makes everyone listen and they listen. And the plan is good.
Teams appear. The string team. The roadway team. The leader sets up production lines. Everyone is involved. And quickly a bridge emerges and normally the girls win. Probably 9 times out of 10.
But occasionally the boys win, and the pattern of their win usually goes like this. Their bridge looks like a shambles. Someone cuts the string and it all collapses and in frustration one of the boys will look at what the girls are doing.
He will only notice the outcome- the bridge itself and not notice the process by which the girls are producing it. He will say, we should do it like theirs. Then they copy the idea. Normally they have wasted too much time and don't have full team participation to pull it back.
Nearly always the boys lose. And they always complain. It's unfair. They had more paper etc. Some excuse. But the girls never complain about losing. It is what it is.
So what is the point of these thoughts? It is about leadership. The young women in my classroom make very good leaders and form successful teams. So if you have read all the way down to this - do consider what you might bring to leadership and go for it @WomenEd #10PercentBraver

More from Education

I was a recipient of KGSP for my Msc from 2013-2016

Korean Government Scholarship Program (KGSP) Application made easy

Application period- 1 February 2021- 31 March, 2021

MS- 3yrs (1 year Korean language + 2 years MS)

PhD- 4yrs (1 year Korean language + 3 years PhD)

How to navigate the
https://t.co/6Ne99JDfyv page

1. Type https://t.co/ow51lWVKcQ in your browser and hit the enter button

2. Click on scholarships and select GKS notice as attached in the picture👇

3. Play with the notice dashboard to see various announcements from NIIED.


4. E.g in 2020, the Global Korea Scholarship for Graduate Degrees was announced on 11, February as indicated by no 205. You can click to download the application materials to get familiar with what is expected. I attached series of links in this thread to assist too.

Category- All fields

Benefits

1. Visa fee

2. Airfare: Actual cost (To and fro from your home country to Korea and upon completion to your home country)

3. Resettlement Allowance: KRW 200,000 (Given upon arrival in Korea)

4. Monthly stipend: Graduate (MS/PhD)-KRW 1000,000 (362,610.35 Nigerian Naira) per month ,Research Program including Postdoctoral fellow and visiting Professors - 1,500,000 KRW (542,824.78 Nigerian Naira) per month
When the university starts sending out teaching evaluation reminders, I tell all my classes about bias in teaching evals, with links to the evidence. Here's a version of the email I send, in case anyone else wants to poach from it.

1/16


When I say "anyone": needless to say, the people who are benefitting from the bias (like me) are the ones who should helping to correct it. Men in math, this is your job! Of course, it should also be dealt with at the institutional level, not just ad hoc.
OK, on to my email:
2/16

"You may have received automated reminders about course evals this fall. I encourage you to fill the evals out. I'd be particularly grateful for written feedback about what worked for you in the class, what was difficult, & how you ultimately spent your time for this class.

3/16

However, I don't feel comfortable just sending you an email saying: "please take the time to evaluate me". I do think student evaluations of teachers can be valuable: I have made changes to my teaching style as a direct result of comments from student teaching evaluations.
4/16

But teaching evaluations have a weakness: they are not an unbiased estimator of teaching quality. There is strong evidence that teaching evals tend to favour men over women, and that teaching evals tend to favour white instructors over non-white instructors.
5/16

You May Also Like