#Deepakntr Super Pattern after a brief consolidation at ATH.
Count clusters till two decimal points.
@srvithal388 @flyingvikas129
More from Aditya Shyam Jalan
@srvithal388 Sir, same thing happened with me, Stop was triggered bcoz of Intraday Move and I decided to enter again by taking the CR, but missed the bus.
Even though bus was missed , I feel delighted bcoz I followed the #process
Even though bus was missed , I feel delighted bcoz I followed the #process
#Deepakntr Super Pattern after a brief consolidation at ATH.
— Aditya Shyam Jalan (@Aditya_Jalan_3) July 7, 2021
Count clusters till two decimal points.@srvithal388 @flyingvikas129 pic.twitter.com/5SFLEmz0Ia
Finally started moving 🌟 A VCP breakout
#Nifty #Happstmnds #Trading #PnF
It was also discussed in #ChitChart by @rajran06 sir.
@Definedge
#Nifty #Happstmnds #Trading #PnF
It was also discussed in #ChitChart by @rajran06 sir.
@Definedge
#HAPPSTMNDS 1%
— Aditya Shyam Jalan (@Aditya_Jalan_3) August 17, 2021
In line with the bullishness of the IT sector. Consolidated after a good upmove, providing a very low risk entry point .
CR entry at 1427
SL as the next probable Triple Bottom Sell at 1344.85#PnF #Trading #Process #StockMarket #StocksToWatch @Definedge pic.twitter.com/k76ViohZF2
More from Deepaknitrate
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
