Excited to see some billionaires and corporations post their best MLK quotes today. Send me your favorites!

Bezos’ personal fortune has increased by more than $75 billion since the pandemic started. Amazon Music pays these artists they’re celebrating $0.00402 per stream.
https://t.co/rpRG3UKNIm
From the racist idiots who blacklisted Colin Kaepernick for speaking out on exactly what this quote says.
https://t.co/3n3sxHvckE
https://t.co/SroctQLtZ5
Biggest stakeholder, Charles Johnson, donated the maximum allowable amount to the campaigns of three United States senators and at least 20 members of the House who voted to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
https://t.co/Y9Lkkf2kkO
Anything that keeps them from actually having to put a supermarket in a Black neighborhood.
https://t.co/NztujzPYOn
Lord. I can’t fucking even. https://t.co/1StGTreZCB
You’re gonna want a drink in hand for the next one. I guarantee.
I can’t fucking even.
https://t.co/WcH2eGNpE7
Wonder why the cops when with this quote? https://t.co/iTTVl6iBtv
Nope.
https://t.co/q7r3W6x1f7
Those Pfizer colleagues don’t include a single Black person in executive leadership.
https://t.co/pcjFZvxwew
Let’s take a music break. (Sponsored by HP, of course.) https://t.co/UO02HA64d6
We made MLK’s monument big so immigrant children could hide behind it when these asshole came round: https://t.co/c7p05gI5A1
This motherfucker LITERALLY attempted to throw away Black people’s votes just a week ago.
https://t.co/rgCxRGLKt4
“It’s quite fun to shoot them, you know. It’s a hell of a hoot. It’s fun to shoot some people.” — James Mattis, former Secretary of Defense
https://t.co/uf5P2gDg8m
Just don’t try to use that GI Bill to get a mortgage or anything. https://t.co/dIpbNvZiJR
https://t.co/N6Q0B6jAv0
Not too long ago she was firing up some racists by telling them “Hitler was right.” https://t.co/fWCQAD74UJ https://t.co/rOJ5bhL1Y0
Tastes like hatred.
https://t.co/FykOc9A0GJ
No one has done more for Blacks and Africans than Bono. And he’ll be the first to tell you that. https://t.co/a9xLCNTrxv
I’m guessing the FBI is busy this year what with chasing down all those racists the cops let into the Capitol (day is young though!) but just in case they don’t come round, here is last year’s EXCELLENT FBI MLK tweet: https://t.co/NYeYapgxR0
Here’s a chaser: https://t.co/FNiR9bCKRm
https://t.co/gMFgSpm4eg
Here’s one immigrant I don’t mind is getting evicted next week.
https://t.co/VgW9kPMRSc
They play FOX News in the lobby and their CEO refuses to say that Black lives matter: https://t.co/nIzKRGKy5I

More from Culture

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
Great article from @AsheSchow. I lived thru the 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's/early 1990's asking myself "Has eveyrbody lost their GODDAMN MINDS?!"


The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.

1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!

2) "Repressed memory" syndrome

3) Facilitated Communication [FC]

All 3 led to massive abuse.

"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.

Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.

FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.

You May Also Like

Assalam Alaiki dear Sister in Islam. I hope this meets you well. Hope you are keeping safe in this pandemic. May Allah preserve you and your beloved family. I would like to address the misconception and misinterpretation in your thread. Please peruse the THREAD below.


1. First off, a disclaimer. Should you feel hurt by my words in the course of the thread, then forgive me. It’s from me and not from Islam. And I probably have to improve on my delivery. And I may not quote you verbatim, but the intended meaning would be there. Thank You!

2. Standing on Imam Shafii’s quote: “And I never debated anyone but that I did not mind whether Allah clarified the truth on my tongue or his tongue” or “I never once debated anyone hoping to win the debate; rather I always wished that the truth would come from his side.”

3. Okay, into the meat (my love for meat is showing. Lol) of the thread. Even though you didn’t mention the verse that permitted polygamy, everyone knows the verse you were talking about (Q4:3).


4. Your reasons for the revelation of the verse are strange. The first time I came across such. I had to quickly consult the books on the exegeses or tafsir of the Quran written by renowned specialists!
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.