#Thread

BHAKTI MARG ACCORDING TO SHIVAPURAN

There Nothing is more pleasurable than the Path of Bhakti in all the Loka's and in all the four Yuga, whoever dives in this sacred ocean of Ishwara's Bhakti , can definitely attain Mokshā and get relief from BhavaSagara ,

it is more pleasing in the Kali Yuga as compared to others., The reason is the lack of both knowledge and disinterest in humans.

Bhakti is the only path through which we can connect with Ishwara and whoever become hurdle in Ishwara's Devotees with bad intentions he is always
punishable by Ishwara.

The Bhakti which is inspired by Shashtra's and is surrendered to Ishwara by heart selflessly , considered to be श्रेष्ठ , and which is full of Selfishness is always called निम्नकोटी भक्ति .
Both these types of devotion are of two types in terms of नैष्ठि and अनैष्ठि

- there are 6 types of नैष्ठि and
- 1 of अनैष्ठि

There are mainly two types of devotion -

1) सगुण
2) निर्गुण
The nine parts of both Nirguna and Saguna have been described, which is something like this -

● श्रवण - Hearing the Lord's Kirtan by drowning in devotion.

● कीर्तन - Performing bhajan with pure devotion by singing the glory of the Lord.
● स्मरण-

~ Remembering God by conquering all kinds of fears. (Nirguna bhakti)
~ To serve the Lord from dawn to dusk. (Saguna)

● सेवन - Control of all senses and following the path of virtue prescribed by the Veda.
● दास्त - Worshipping of Ishwarā with the heart's nectar of devotion.

● अर्चन - Always consider yourself to be Prabhu Kinkar and always being indulge in worshipping Ishwara.
● वंदन - Ashtang Pranam to the presiding deity by settling the Ishwara in the mind and chanting mantras.

● सख्य - Have unwavering faith in Ishwara, that there is something good in both in मंगल and अमंगल ।
● आत्मसमर्पण - Surrender to Ishwarā without devoid of subsistence worries.

According to Mahashiva Purana, all these Bhakti Mārga are always said to be the ones providing salvation .
Sorry for typos 😔🙏

More from ༺【 Sānşकृति 】༻

More from Culture

One of the authors of the Policy Exchange report on academic free speech thinks it is "ridiculous" to expect him to accurately portray an incident at Cardiff University in his study, both in the reporting and in a question put to a student sample.


Here is the incident Kaufmann incorporated into his study, as told by a Cardiff professor who was there. As you can see, the incident involved the university intervening to *uphold* free speech principles:


Here is the first mention of the Greer at Cardiff incident in Kaufmann's report. It refers to the "concrete case" of the "no-platforming of Germaine Greer". Any reasonable reader would assume that refers to an incident of no-platforming instead of its opposite.


Here is the next mention of Greer in the report. The text asks whether the University "should have overruled protestors" and "stepped in...and guaranteed Greer the right to speak". Again the strong implication is that this did not happen and Greer was "no platformed".


The authors could easily have added a footnote at this point explaining what actually happened in Cardiff. They did not.

You May Also Like