"In Hinduo ne Guruo ke saath Gaddari ki"
That's how an average Khalisi thinks, why? Because of over compensation and appeasement by RWers.
Now Fact Check:
1. Sawai Jai Singh & Ram Singh saved Guru Tegbahadur from Aurangzeb.
Yograj Singh father of Yuvraj Singh made some blasphemous comments on Hindu Community.
Here are some of them:
"Inki Aurate Take-Take ke Bhaw Bikti thi"
"Humne inki aurato ko bachaya"
"Ye Hindu Gaddar Hai, 1000 saal mughalo ki ghulami ki"
"Don't trust Gujaratis like Modi & Shah--
"In Hinduo ne Guruo ke saath Gaddari ki"
That's how an average Khalisi thinks, why? Because of over compensation and appeasement by RWers.
Now Fact Check:
1. Sawai Jai Singh & Ram Singh saved Guru Tegbahadur from Aurangzeb.
3. Most ferocious fighter of Sikhs Banda Vairagi was a Hindu Rajput of Jammu.
5. Ramgarh, raipur rani, Chamba, Raikot are places where Sikhs got protection from Mughals, all were Hindu Rajput ruled.
7. 18,500 acres of land was given to Sikhs at Nankana Saheb by Rao Bullar Bhatti.
10. Patiala Royals along with a dozen other sikh royals "claim" To be descendants of Hindu Rajputs.
11. The first governor of Sikh Raj was a Rajput: Baj Singh.
More from Culture
OK. Chapter 7 of Book 4 of #WealthOfNations is tough going. It's long. It's serious. It's all about colonies.
We can take comfort, though, in knowing that the chapter #AdamSmith says is about colonies is, in fact, about colonies. (IV.vii) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Colonies were a vexed subject when #AdamSmith was writing, and they’re even more complicated now. So, before we even get to the tweeting, here’s a link to that thread on Smith and “savage nations.” (IV.vii) #WealthOfTweets
The reason for the ancient Greeks and Romans to settle colonies was straightforward: they didn’t have enough space for their growing populations. Their colonies were treated as “emancipated children”—connected but independent. (IV.vii.a.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
(Both these things are in contrast to the European colonies, as we'll see.) (IV.vii.a.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Ancient Greeks and Romans needed more space because the land was owned by an increasingly small number of citizens and farming and nearly all trades and arts were performed by slaves. It was hard for a poor freeman to improve his life. (IV.vii.a.3) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
We can take comfort, though, in knowing that the chapter #AdamSmith says is about colonies is, in fact, about colonies. (IV.vii) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Colonies were a vexed subject when #AdamSmith was writing, and they’re even more complicated now. So, before we even get to the tweeting, here’s a link to that thread on Smith and “savage nations.” (IV.vii) #WealthOfTweets
We have to pause now, because we have to have a whole new tweet thread on #AdamSmith and \u201csavage nations,\u201d because he\u2019s going to keep using this kind of phrase, so we need to talk about it. #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
— @AdamSmithWorks (@adamsmithworks) January 4, 2021
The reason for the ancient Greeks and Romans to settle colonies was straightforward: they didn’t have enough space for their growing populations. Their colonies were treated as “emancipated children”—connected but independent. (IV.vii.a.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
(Both these things are in contrast to the European colonies, as we'll see.) (IV.vii.a.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Ancient Greeks and Romans needed more space because the land was owned by an increasingly small number of citizens and farming and nearly all trades and arts were performed by slaves. It was hard for a poor freeman to improve his life. (IV.vii.a.3) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
