called Sushant's calm and zen-like nature fake and called him insecure. Tell your source or issue a public apology statement. If you forgot check the attached image.

#NepoBootlickerMasand

2. @RajeevMasand posts another nasty blind item about a fake metoo story & DilBechara.This metoo story never caught on but someone wanted to imply that this won't be released cz of that See what the fans have observed in comments.
Rajeev Say Sorry.

#NepoBootlickerMasand
Here just after one flop, Rajeev Masand chose to fall Sushant an "overpaid outsider". The ripple of writing him off just like that. Why? On who behest?
Ans my Question You #NepoBootlickerMasand ,Mr @RajeevMasand . I want your Public Apology Mr @RajeevMasand
#NepoBootlickerMasand
There are many more blinds which are third rate gossip with only mission being to write Sushant Singh off. Sushant's fan questioning Rajeev over his repeated disgusting blinds against SSR back in 2017
@RajeevMasand Why You was continuously targetting SSR?
#NepoBootlickerMasand
Filmy blogs,fans,Bollywood lovers like me always wondered hw is it that Sushant is only finding himself in the worse of the worst blinds.Why did someone hate him as much?He was never a threat, never publically spoke ill about someone then why?

#NepoBootlickerMasand
His playboy image was being carefully propagated. Every other blind spoke of "alcoholism" or a disrespectful womanizer. His fans wondered a year ago. Why, was someone enjoying this sadism?. Even today we wonder,why?

Tell @RajeevMasand Why?

#NepoBootlickerMasand
Rajeev Masand has not said a word on Sushant on SM . Can you imagine a film journo not speaking about the death of an A list actor.Probably wld hve if it was a blind? Wonder if he will ever answer why he did what he did!?

Can you tell @RajeevMasand

#NepoBootlickerMasand
No, it wasn't just Rajeev Masand but also Pinkvilla,MumbaiMirror,missmalini,bollywoodlife etc that carried blinds against SSR. If one called him a womaniser than other would try to call him gay. Yeah. Gay. 1/2

#NepoBootlickerMasand
But Rajeev was the only top journo with influence to do it repeatedly.

Can you tell me @RajeevMasand Why you was doing this unethical act repeteadly. Who Paid You to do this? 2/2
#NepoBootlickerMasand
The no. of blinds against SSR in just a year 2019-20 crossed 10+,mind you each one is negative. In addition to this, there are articles of him being banned too happened. So much so that a reddit handle thought to make sense of it all just about 2 months ago
#NepoBootlickerMasand
There is one person who is now targeted in the blinds regularly is
@TheAaryanKartik
.. Womanizer,flirt, being shouted at by Saif etc etc. Kriti Sanon ,Rajkummar Rao, Kangana too have featured every now n then but none as much as Sushant.

#NepoBootlickerMasand
Eg of a nasty blind on
@TheAaryanKartik
as recent as Jul10 source :Pinkvilla
It says Kjo is just "toleratin him"
That he is on the "prowl" (women), he got reprimanded by Saif for "flirting" with Bebo. 1/2

#NepoBootlickerMasand
It is so detailed that it will be believed. Last pic wt the bloggr observes.

2/2

#NepoBootlickerMasand
This guy Somen (NotSoSnob) who made his career out of hating mainstream b'wood in his blog(moifightclub),blind (aao guess karein) ,tweets is ironically now the creative developmemt head at Dharma. 1/2

#NepoBootlickerMasand
He used to work under Masand & called him the best boss. SS frm his blogs.Check 3rd

2/2

#NepoBootlickerMasand
Reporting on blind items is done. Rajeev Masand is contacted but AGAIN he refuses to say a word & skirts the topic of why he used the word "skirt chaser" for #SSR by saying "I don't really want to speak about it" See the link below

https://t.co/5SPyy3uds8

#NepoBootlickerMasand
And the Worst Part is even Mumbai Police didn't took any action against him after summoned .

#NepoBootlickerMasand
Content of Some Blind Articles on SSR by @RajeevMasand
can be read on the below link word by word.

https://t.co/CiIFgsYyqS

#NepoBootlickerMasand

More from Crime

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.