Why I don't trust or believe the Gov on Covid.

80% of hospitalised patients are Vit D deficient - Gov ignored this but now claims to promote Vit D though I've seen no advertising.

BMI over 40 = 90% greater risk of dieing from Covid - Gov closes gyms and locks people up.

Hcq proves effective - Gov bans it

Ivermectin proves effective - Gov bans it.

Remdesivir proves ineffective - Gov promotes it.

Flu shots increase the risk of Covid - Gov pushes for mass flu vaccination
government agrees massive health data-sharing contracts with Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Faculty and Palantir - Gov has to be sued to reveal it.

Asymptomatic transmission proved in multiple studies to be rare - Gov releases an advert saying 1 in 3 may be asymptomatic.
People start quoting current NHS data - Gov suspends it.

Gov build nightingale hospitals but don't have the staff to man them - Gov lies and says they're on standby.

Ex NHS staff contacted to be re-employed for crisis- Gov never bothers to call.
BBC says excess deaths for 2020 are worst than since WW2 - ONS shows when adjusted for population increase it was the 9th worst year in the last 20yrs.

Whitty and Neil Ferguson mention possible future herd immunity - Gov and advisors have always denied it exists.
Lateral flow tests and PCR tests show different rates of infection - Gov pushes out mass testing.

Gov publishes daily Covid admissions - Gov doesn't publish daily Covid discharges.
The bmj asks for Government conflict of interest report for Covid contracts - Gov stalls on releasing data.

Ministers ask for an economic and health assessment for lockdowns - Gov produces a pointless report.

Many more examples exist.

This whole thing is a sham.

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.