See below the nonfarm payrolls for oil & gas extraction which is also at historical lows.
To recall:
The green agenda hasn’t even started.
A classic early sign of a commodity cycle.
Mining industry nonfarm payrolls near historical lows.
This happened in early 1970s & 2000s.
Both marked the onset of a commodities bull market.
Labor & capital constraints are the amplifiers of bull market in resource stocks.
👇👇👇
See below the nonfarm payrolls for oil & gas extraction which is also at historical lows.
To recall:
The green agenda hasn’t even started.
To be fair, this is not a domestic problem.
We’re are experiencing similar issues worldwide.
Resource companies have been facing a deep recession for some time now with not enough workers willing to enter this industry.
Government policies seem to be discouraging folks from return to the labor market.
People continue to leave the labor force like never before.
This upward pressure in consumer prices is probably just getting started.
“Coke Cola will raise prices to offset higher commodity costs”
https://t.co/ke4CgsPm70
https://t.co/434i1TTtTx
“Finance chiefs look to price increases to offset higher commodities costs”
https://t.co/5Eo7vgDHlb
More from Commodities
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.