I told you guys it was the tip of the iceberg, and Republicans would regret making comments. The reporting is finally catching up with the breadth of the scandal. Still, folks in the media don't want to go there entirely yet because the truth will tear this country apart.
More from Category
PFIZER vaccine. When there is risk, there should always be a choice, with no coercion 👊
FROM THE CDC; 3,150 people vaccinated are "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work" after vaccination.
A massive 2.7% of people who can no longer work... see thread
after having the Pfizer vaccine.
https://t.co/6B5xSwXQbR
Portuguese health worker, 41, dies two days after getting the Pfizer covid vaccine as her father says he 'wants
Mexican doctor hospitalized after receiving COVID-19 vaccine
https://t.co/dS4qAhSAZN
Hundreds of Israelis get infected with Covid-19 after receiving Pfizer/BioNTech
Wife of 'perfectly healthy' Miami doctor, 56, who died of a blood disorder 16 days after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is certain it was triggered by the jab, as drug giant investigates first death with a suspected link to
75-year-old Israeli man dies 2 hours after getting Covid-19 vaccine.
https://t.co/TvuI3Gfo4R
Death of Swiss man after Pfizer vaccine.
https://t.co/smhsyGTndy
88-year-old collapses and dies several hours after being
FROM THE CDC; 3,150 people vaccinated are "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work" after vaccination.
A massive 2.7% of people who can no longer work... see thread
after having the Pfizer vaccine.
https://t.co/6B5xSwXQbR
Portuguese health worker, 41, dies two days after getting the Pfizer covid vaccine as her father says he 'wants
Mexican doctor hospitalized after receiving COVID-19 vaccine
https://t.co/dS4qAhSAZN
Hundreds of Israelis get infected with Covid-19 after receiving Pfizer/BioNTech
Wife of 'perfectly healthy' Miami doctor, 56, who died of a blood disorder 16 days after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is certain it was triggered by the jab, as drug giant investigates first death with a suspected link to
75-year-old Israeli man dies 2 hours after getting Covid-19 vaccine.
https://t.co/TvuI3Gfo4R
Death of Swiss man after Pfizer vaccine.
https://t.co/smhsyGTndy
88-year-old collapses and dies several hours after being
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?