Here's how American news outlets framed the announcement from disgraced ex-president Donald Trump that he would once again seek elected office 🧵 1/

The Washington Post highlights that Trump faces "multiple criminal investigations" and notes that he refused to accept the outcome of the 2020 election, which he lost. 2/
NPR tags Trump for refusing to concede and fomenting a deadly insurrection. Keep it up. 3/
NYT focuses on the political horserace within the GOP in their tweet, but the graphic does focus on "multiple ongoing state and federal investigations" into Trump. 4/
CNN doesn't mention his criminal behavior or toxic politics, just the bit of trivia about him seeking non-consecutive terms in the White House. Try harder, CNN. 5/
ABC News and ABC's dedicated politics team leave a lot to be desired in their framing of Trump's attempted return to the White House. 6/
Equally weak effort from the team at CBS News, including the political desk. The thing people need to know about Trump is that he's a dangerous criminal who tried to overthrow the government! 7/
NBC News and MSNBC basically putting zero effort into the part of their story that the vast majority of people will actually read (the tweet). 8/
It should probably be cause for alarm within NBC News that their first shot at framing Trump's attempted return to power is exactly the same as Fox News' pre-scheduled tweet. 9/
Anyway... why go to all the trouble of this? Because the way the media talk about Trump is deadly important. They turned him into a viable candidate in 2016 by not portraying him as a fraud and a con man from the start. Could they make the same mistake again? You bet.

More from Category pdfmakerapp grab pdfmakerapp grab this readwiseio save readwiseio save thread threader compile summarize threadreaderapp unroll please ttttreads unroll unrollthreadcom

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.