A thread about Twitter. First let us stipulate that Elon musk is a disgrace and a partner with the murderous Saudi regime. But at least for now I am going to stick it out on Twitter. I came to the platform very reluctantly years ago, pulled into it by my editor. 1

A great way to sell books and promote yourself, he said. I thought, what can you do in 140 characters that isn’t just trivial? But I quickly discovered that there is a lot more to Twitter than that, and that you can say a lot in one tweet and in multiple ones. 2
I learned that when I followed interesting people, I could click on things to read that I would not otherwise discover that were enlightening, entertaining and edifying. Along with videos that made me laugh or made me cry. (H/T @RexChapman) 3
I have built a community of friendships that I would never have found otherwise. Some of these friendships have endured and really enriched my life. Some ate famous people, others are not. All are interesting, morally strong and admirable. I do not want to lose that community. 4
I found a place where I could be candid about my own traumas, including the loss of my son, & be surrounded by warmth and love. I could tweet about my dog lost in downtown DC and have 28,000 people respond, both with sympathy and calls to help keep a lookout to find him. 5
Twitter is a place where I can vent and fulminate about evil and injustice, which is better than screaming at the television set or the wall. A place where I could indeed promote not just my own books, articles, and podcast (w @kavitapmd,) but also great stuff by others. 6
If Musk keeps up his current path, allowing hatred and vitriol to flourish, promoting conspiracy theories himself, If we find data misused, or the Saudi’s abusing it to punish dissidents, we all might be forced to leave and try to find another platform. But I’ll stay. For now. 7
Let’s face it: we are at a critical point in our country, w a real possibility of losing our democracy, and sliding into an autocracy, and a period where real violence, incited by some of our own political actors and media owners, could prevail. We need to fight back. Here. 8

More from Category pdfmakerapp grab pdfmakerapp grab this readwiseio save readwiseio save thread threader compile summarize threadreaderapp unroll please ttttreads unroll unrollthreadcom

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x