8Key Idea💡"The All-or-Nothing Marriage"
Part2
⚡ Psychology book thread

5️⃣There are helpful love hacks to help you overcome low self-esteem and increase gratitude for your relationship.
⭕Denise Marigold, points out that people with low self-esteem tend to dismiss any compliment they may receive from their partner.

⭕So Marigold’s advice is to have the dismissive partner stop to reflect on the compliments they are given.
⭕Rather than responding with disbelief, they should ask themselves: What exactly was said? What is the deeper meaning? And why is this significant to the relationship?

⭕Another love hack that may come in handy is about increasing gratitude.
6️⃣A happy marriage requires time and attention.
Studies show that making enough time for a marriage is key to making your relationship a happy and prosperous one.
⭕But it’s not just about making sure couples spend time together; it’s about really paying attention to your partner and understanding what he or she is going through.
⭕Experience shows that active engagement with one another is especially important after having your first child and after a relationship has been under considerable stress.
7: Partners must maintain their individual identity, even if it means living separately.

⭕So it’s important to nurture your own individual identity by tending to personal goals&friendships that aren’t connected to the relationship, no matter how special the relationship seems.
8️⃣Open relationships must be well-managed, but they can be just as rewarding as monogamous ones.

So obviously, non-monogamous relationships aren’t for everyone.The non-monogamous participants actually appeared to have more trust for their partners and experienced less jealousy.
🚨Make sure u follow @relation_dr to read subsequent tweet!
The previous part (part1)
https://t.co/wtaBqhjQbe

More from Books

You May Also Like

Funny, before the election I recall lefties muttering the caravan must have been a Trump setup because it made the open borders crowd look so bad. Why would the pro-migrant crowd engineer a crisis that played into Trump's hands? THIS is why. THESE are the "optics" they wanted.


This media manipulation effort was inspired by the success of the "kids in cages" freakout, a 100% Stalinist propaganda drive that required people to forget about Obama putting migrant children in cells. It worked, so now they want pics of Trump "gassing children on the border."

There's a heavy air of Pallywood around the whole thing as well. If the Palestinians can stage huge theatrical performances of victimhood with the willing cooperation of Western media, why shouldn't the migrant caravan organizers expect the same?

It's business as usual for Anarchy, Inc. - the worldwide shredding of national sovereignty to increase the power of transnational organizations and left-wing ideology. Many in the media are true believers. Others just cannot resist the narrative of "change" and "social justice."

The product sold by Anarchy, Inc. is victimhood. It always boils down to the same formula: once the existing order can be painted as oppressors and children as their victims, chaos wins and order loses. Look at the lefties shrieking in unison about "Trump gassing children" today.
I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.


Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel

He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:

He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:

He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
I like this heuristic, and have a few which are similar in intent to it:


Hiring efficiency:

How long does it take, measured from initial expression of interest through offer of employment signed, for a typical candidate cold inbounding to the company?

What is the *theoretical minimum* for *any* candidate?

How long does it take, as a developer newly hired at the company:

* To get a fully credentialed machine issued to you
* To get a fully functional development environment on that machine which could push code to production immediately
* To solo ship one material quanta of work

How long does it take, from first idea floated to "It's on the Internet", to create a piece of marketing collateral.

(For bonus points: break down by ambitiousness / form factor.)

How many people have to say yes to do something which is clearly worth doing which costs $5,000 / $15,000 / $250,000 and has never been done before.