#BHEL FUT. (15TF):- 65.7 to 66.8 https://t.co/Qhy32kATOY

#Watchlist#BHEL FUT . (15TF):- CMP 65.7 LOOKS GOOD FOR 69 SL 64@RajarshitaS @MD_ABNSTOCKS pic.twitter.com/7hvPc9NJOa
— Sagar Solanki (@Charts_insiders) July 2, 2021
More from Sagar Solanki
#Watchlist
#GUJGASLTD (2 hours): -687.5 CMP, with support If 680 holds, then 730/800 is on the way :)
#Disclaimer:- View shared is for educational purposes only. Conduct your due diligence before making any trading/investment decisions.
@caniravkaria @nishkumar1977 https://t.co/IoIa9TASCm
#GUJGASLTD (2 hours): -687.5 CMP, with support If 680 holds, then 730/800 is on the way :)
#Disclaimer:- View shared is for educational purposes only. Conduct your due diligence before making any trading/investment decisions.
@caniravkaria @nishkumar1977 https://t.co/IoIa9TASCm

Gujarat Gas.... CMP 700...
— Nirav S. Karia (@caniravkaria) September 3, 2021
Baby \U0001f37c \U0001f425 steps \U0001fa9c
Request views and guidance from experts \U0001f64f
(Purely for educational purposes) pic.twitter.com/Eidd0AHZlz
More from Bhel
#Bhel 6% up if daily candle close above 60 to 61 then 67 or 80 lvls coming
@KUTrack @masterchefsd @cat_trader007 @AnshumanCharts @IntradayGeeks @charts_breakout @Anshi_________ @Kavitastocks @TechCheckByNiti @ipo_mantra
@KUTrack @masterchefsd @cat_trader007 @AnshumanCharts @IntradayGeeks @charts_breakout @Anshi_________ @Kavitastocks @TechCheckByNiti @ipo_mantra
#bhel morning star pattern on support looking good for swing @masterchefsd @Anshi_________ @AnshumanCharts @charts_breakout @JayneshKasliwal @kuttrapali26 @cat_trader007 pic.twitter.com/OWlgGLI1MS
— preet (@preet8699) September 22, 2021
#BHEL 57 to 73 in 4 trading days🛩️🛩️.
Around 73 / 74 - is the first target - next targets around 110.
Remember :Keeping a stop is always important if one is trading.
@caniravkaria https://t.co/ViHbzJTfQ6
Around 73 / 74 - is the first target - next targets around 110.
Remember :Keeping a stop is always important if one is trading.
@caniravkaria https://t.co/ViHbzJTfQ6

#BHEL looks good for targets of 74+ https://t.co/jrRyXc5FLL pic.twitter.com/KWkzeHSs0D
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) May 6, 2021
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.