Bad Ven - loose sexual conduct,poor dressing sense / untidy
Bad Saturn- lazy , procrastinating
Bad Rahu - liars, cheaters, obsession
Bad ketu - impatient , impulsive , no sense of discrimination
#ASTRO
Change yourself and make your planets positive 🌺🍀
Bad Su- can’t handle criticism and look for freebies all the time
Bad Mo- don’t have a grip over their emotions / less attention span
Bad Ma- volatile anger /abusive
Bad Me - argumentative/ poor communication
#ASTRO
More from Twinkle
More from Astro
Indication Of Afflicted Jupiter In Astrology -
Jupiter is the most auspicious planet,that makes people rich,spiritual, educated, wise cultured, liberal & generous.Jupiter is our jeeva karka "life force energy".
When it is afflicted in a chart he create major issues in our life.
Some of biggest indications of afflicted Jupiter -
•Unexplained weight gains.
•Loss of reputation or wealth.
• Differences with your Guru.
• Diabetes are also seen through afflicted jupiter.
•Extravagant.
•Unable to focus on studies.
•Illicit/ extra marital relations
•Prone of lying or cheating or misbehaving with Guru/teacher.
•Husband facing problems/ hardships
• Husband giving sufferings or vice versa
• Progeny facing problems/ hardships
•Progeny giving sufferings or vice versa
•Becoming immoral or selfish.
•Biliary issues.
Some simple Jupiter remedies
Jupiter is the most auspicious planet,that makes people rich,spiritual, educated, wise cultured, liberal & generous.Jupiter is our jeeva karka "life force energy".
When it is afflicted in a chart he create major issues in our life.
Some of biggest indications of afflicted Jupiter -
•Unexplained weight gains.
•Loss of reputation or wealth.
• Differences with your Guru.
• Diabetes are also seen through afflicted jupiter.
•Extravagant.
•Unable to focus on studies.
•Illicit/ extra marital relations
•Prone of lying or cheating or misbehaving with Guru/teacher.
•Husband facing problems/ hardships
• Husband giving sufferings or vice versa
• Progeny facing problems/ hardships
•Progeny giving sufferings or vice versa
•Becoming immoral or selfish.
•Biliary issues.
Some simple Jupiter remedies
\u2022Jupiter - keep your North east direction always clean and keep deities pictures there. Donate yellow cloths,Saffron , turmeric
— \U0001f940\U0001d434\U0001d451\U0001d456\U0001d443\U0001d44e\U0001d45f\U0001d44e\U0001d460\u210e\U0001d44e\U0001d458\U0001d461\U0001d456\u0950 \U0001f531 (@Jyotishsadhana) June 19, 2021
or bananas to needy people on Thursday. Wearing gold also strengthen Jupiter.
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
