More from Saket Reddy
COFORGE
Double Top Buy above 3426.76 daily close on 1% box size chart. https://t.co/geOoLAc5XU
Double Top Buy above 3426.76 daily close on 1% box size chart. https://t.co/geOoLAc5XU

COFORGE
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) May 6, 2021
Triple Top Buy above 3196.21 daily close on 1% Box size chart & Double Top Buy above 3195.68 daily close on 3% Box size chart. https://t.co/RI62IqiBoL pic.twitter.com/jvTNSR7W7P
JBCHEPHARM
Double Top Buy triggered above 1933.43 daily close on 3% Box size chart. https://t.co/eELxOeNmvg
Double Top Buy triggered above 1933.43 daily close on 3% Box size chart. https://t.co/eELxOeNmvg

JBCHEPHARM
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) July 16, 2021
Double Top Buy, Super Pattern - Bullish and T20 Pattern - Bullish triggered above 1886.26 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/bzIsbWjbEP pic.twitter.com/JQVkao635V
You May Also Like
Trending news of The Rock's daughter Simone Johnson's announcing her new Stage Name is breaking our Versus tool because "Wrestling Name" isn't in our database!
Here's the most useful #Factualist comparison pages #Thread ๐งต
What is the difference between โpseudonymโ and โstage name?โ
Pseudonym means โa fictitious name (more literally, a false name), as those used by writers and movie stars,โ while stage name is โthe pseudonym of an entertainer.โ
https://t.co/hT5XPkTepy #english #wiki #wikidiff
People also found this comparison helpful:
Alias #versus Stage Name: Whatโs the difference?
Alias means โanother name; an assumed name,โ while stage name means โthe pseudonym of an entertainer.โ
https://t.co/Kf7uVKekMd #Etymology #words
Another common #question:
What is the difference between โaliasโ and โpseudonym?โ
As nouns alias means โanother name; an assumed name,โ while pseudonym means โa fictitious name (more literally, a false name), as those used by writers and movie
Here is a very basic #comparison: "Name versus Stage Name"
As #nouns, the difference is that name means โany nounal word or phrase which indicates a particular person, place, class, or thing,โ but stage name means โthe pseudonym of an
Here's the most useful #Factualist comparison pages #Thread ๐งต

What is the difference between โpseudonymโ and โstage name?โ
Pseudonym means โa fictitious name (more literally, a false name), as those used by writers and movie stars,โ while stage name is โthe pseudonym of an entertainer.โ
https://t.co/hT5XPkTepy #english #wiki #wikidiff
People also found this comparison helpful:
Alias #versus Stage Name: Whatโs the difference?
Alias means โanother name; an assumed name,โ while stage name means โthe pseudonym of an entertainer.โ
https://t.co/Kf7uVKekMd #Etymology #words
Another common #question:
What is the difference between โaliasโ and โpseudonym?โ
As nouns alias means โanother name; an assumed name,โ while pseudonym means โa fictitious name (more literally, a false name), as those used by writers and movie
Here is a very basic #comparison: "Name versus Stage Name"
As #nouns, the difference is that name means โany nounal word or phrase which indicates a particular person, place, class, or thing,โ but stage name means โthe pseudonym of an
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x