Exactly 1 year ago, I wrote my first post on LinkedIn.

It blew up.

A few months later, I figured Twitter out.

Now I have 51k followers across both platforms + massive credibility + a profitable side hustle.

All I did was follow these 4 writing principles:

1. Write an attention-grabbing hook
2. Prioritize structure
3. Make it about your audience
4. Deliver on your promises

Let's get specific ↓
1. Write an attention-grabbing hook

People want to know:

-Why should I read this?
-How will it help me?
-What will I learn?

To answer those Qs:

-Poke at pain points to light up emotions
-Add credibility to build trust
-Build intrigue to pique interest
-Leave a cliffhanger
There's a difference between shitty and valuable hooks.

Shitty hooks are regurgitated and soulless.

Or, they're clickbait (designed to capture attention but have zero value).

Here's how to write valuable & differentiated hooks instead:

https://t.co/xFus07265S
2. Prioritize structure

The best writing, presented in the wrong order, won't move the needle.

Your narrative arc needs to match your format, e.g.:

-Storytelling
-Listicles
-How to

Here's a snapshot of a "How to" vs. a "Lessons" listicle:

cc @KateBour
Beyond the content format as a whole, you also need to strategically structure your hooks/individual tweets/paragraphs.

There are several formulas and frameworks out there.

Here's the one I use most often:

SCQA ↓
1. Situation (summary)
2. Complication (problem)
3. Question (transition)
4. Answer (solution)

E.g.

-Clickbait posts attract followers
-But disinterested audiences rarely buy
-The key to valuable growth that converts?
-Content that resonates & builds authority
The above example could work as a hook or in the body part of your post.

Here's my favorite example of this format in a hook:

cc: @amandanat
3. Make it about your audience

People want to learn, grow, overcome problems, & reach goals.

You can talk about yourself but in the context of helping others.

Posts that are specific, direct, and outcome-driven perform much better than generalized, self-serving shares.

E.g.↓
Self-centered:

"My business is killing it. I've created amazing processes. Here's my story."

Audience-centered:

"I've built my business to $X MRR in 2 years. How? Documented processes from day 1 so I could delegate & focus on sales. Here are 7 lessons to scale efficiently."
The 2nd example does these things well:

-Adds quantifiable proof ($X MRR in 2 years)
-Gets specific with outcomes (delegate to save time + focus on sales)
-Tells the reader exactly what they'll learn (scale efficiently)

This builds trust and intrigue, which leads to clicks.
4. Deliver on your promises

You want readers to:

-Feel like they're learning
-Experience zero friction
-Stay interested throughout

To do that:

-Share unique insights
-Add the "why" and "how"
-Show, don't just tell

This helps them...
-Visualize the concepts you’re explaining
-Extract takeaways they can act on
-Reach “aha!” moments
-Get past objections
-Stay entertained

Consider:

-Why does this matter to my audience?
-How can the reader act on this?
-Can I back this up with data?
-What's the impact of this?
All of this said, writing advice means nothing if you don't:

-Know who you are
-Know who your audience is

This is not a one-and-done exercise.

Both you and your audience will continuously evolve.

Pay attention to those changes and shift your strategy accordingly.
I hope this helps you create more impactful social posts!

Follow me @ericasmyname for more.

And comment and retweet as you please :)

For easy sharing: https://t.co/2hATQoGeU9

More from All

1. Mini Thread on Conflicts of Interest involving the authors of the Nature Toilet Paper:
https://t.co/VUYbsKGncx
Kristian G. Andersen
Andrew Rambaut
Ian Lipkin
Edward C. Holmes
Robert F. Garry

2. Thanks to @newboxer007 for forwarding the link to the research by an Australian in Taiwan (not on

3. K.Andersen didn't mention "competing interests"
Only Garry listed Zalgen Labs, which we will look at later.
In acknowledgements, Michael Farzan, Wellcome Trust, NIH, ERC & ARC are mentioned.
Author affiliations listed as usual.
Note the 328 Citations!
https://t.co/nmOeohM89Q


4. Kristian Andersen (1)
Andersen worked with USAMRIID & Fort Detrick scientists on research, with Robert Garry, Jens Kuhn & Sina Bavari among


5. Kristian Andersen (2)
Works at Scripps Research Institute, which WAS in serious financial trouble, haemorrhaging 20 million $ a year.
But just when the first virus cases were emerging, they received great news.
They issued a press release dated November 27, 2019:

You May Also Like

#தினம்_ஒரு_திருவாசகம்
தொல்லை இரும்பிறவிச் சூழும் தளை நீக்கி
அல்லல் அறுத்து ஆனந்தம் ஆக்கியதே – எல்லை
மருவா நெறியளிக்கும் வாதவூர் எங்கோன்
திருவாசகம் என்னும் தேன்

பொருள்:
1.எப்போது ஆரம்பித்தது என அறியப்படமுடியாத தொலை காலமாக (தொல்லை)

2. இருந்து வரும் (இரும்)


3.பிறவிப் பயணத்திலே ஆழ்த்துகின்ற (பிறவி சூழும்)

4.அறியாமையாகிய இடரை (தளை)

5.அகற்றி (நீக்கி),

6.அதன் விளைவால் சுகதுக்கமெனும் துயரங்கள் விலக (அல்லல் அறுத்து),

7.முழுநிறைவாய்த் தன்னுளே இறைவனை உணர்த்துவதே (ஆனந்த மாக்கியதே),

8.பிறந்து இறக்கும் காலவெளிகளில் (எல்லை)

9.பிணைக்காமல் (மருவா)

10.காக்கும் மெய்யறிவினைத் தருகின்ற (நெறியளிக்கும்),

11.என் தலைவனான மாணிக்க வாசகரின் (வாதவூரெங்கோன்)

12.திருவாசகம் எனும் தேன் (திருவா சகமென்னுந் தேன்)

முதல்வரி: பிறவி என்பது முன்வினை விதையால் முளைப்பதோர் பெருமரம். அந்த ‘முன்வினை’ எங்கு ஆரம்பித்தது எனச் சொல்ல இயலாது. ஆனால் ‘அறியாமை’ ஒன்றே ஆசைக்கும்,, அச்சத்துக்கும் காரணம் என்பதால், அவையே வினைகளை விளைவிப்பன என்பதால், தொடர்ந்து வரும் பிறவிகளுக்கு, ‘அறியாமையே’ காரணம்

அறியாமைக்கு ஆரம்பம் கிடையாது. நமக்கு ஒரு பொருளைப் பற்றிய அறிவு எப்போதிருந்து இல்லை? அதைச் சொல்ல முடியாது. அதனாலேதான் முதலடியில், ஆரம்பமில்லாத அஞ்ஞானத்தை பிறவிகளுக்குக் காரணமாகச் சொல்லியது. ஆனால் அறியாமை, அறிவின் எழுச்சியால், அப்போதே முடிந்து விடும்.