کارگل کی جنگ 3 مئی تا 26 جولائی 1999 لڑی گئی- لیفٹیننٹ جنرل (ر) شاہد عزیز اسوقت ISI میں بطور DG Analysis Wing تعینات تھے- انہوں نے 14 ستمبر 1999 کو بطور DG ملٹری آپریشنز چارج سنبھالا- ریٹائرمنٹ کے بعد انہوں نے مذکورہ جنگ کے حوالے سے اپنی کتاب "یہ خاموشی کہاں تک"..(جاری ⬇️) 1/22
دوستوں کی دلچسپی کیلئے اسکے چند اہم اقتباسات تحریر کر رہا ہوں:
١- ڈی جی ISI لفٹیننٹ جنرل ضیاء الدین کیساتھ میٹنگ میں میں نے انڈیا کے مواصلاتی انٹرسیپٹ (wireless intercepts) دکھاتے ہوۓ کہا کہ "لگتا ہے ہماری فوج نے کارگل کے علاقے میں..(جاری ⬇️) 3/22
دوسرے دن MO میں ہمیں بریفنگ کیلئے بلایا گیا- وہاں چیف آف جنرل اسٹاف لفٹیننٹ جنرل عزیز خان سمیت GHQ کے تمام لفٹیننٹ جنرلز موجود تھے-..(جاری ⬇️) 4/22
٢- جن دنوں میں..(جاری ⬇️) 6/22
جب بریفنگ کیلئے پہنچا تو پتہ چلا کہ سوائے جنرل مشرّف,لفٹیننٹ..(جاری ⬇️) 8/22
٣- فوج میں جب بھی کوئی منصوبہ بنایا جاتا ہے ہر قسم کی مشکلات اور دشمن کے ہر ردعمل کا جائزہ لیا جاتا ہے- یہاں..(جاری ⬇️) 10/22
٤- فوجی لیڈر کی دانائی اگر اسقدر محدود ہے کہ فیصلہ لینے سے پہلے اسے اپنے فیصلے کے اثرات کا علم ہی نہیں تو اسے فوج کی کمانڈ کرنے کا ہرگز حق نہیں- مگر افسوس ہے کہ ہماری تاریخ میں..(جاری ⬇️) 12/22
٥- میں وثوق سے نہیں کہہ سکتا کہ پرائم منسٹر نواز شریف کو باقاعدہ طریقےسے بتایا گیا یا نہیں- (صفحہ 200)-
٦- جیسے دشمن نے دھوکے سے چھپی ہوئی کارروائی کر کے سیاچن پر قبضہ کیا تھا, ویسی ہی چھپی ہوئی کارروائی سےہم سیاچن کو واپس..(جاری ⬇️) 13/22
٨- کچھ عرصے بعد جب فوجی..(جاری ⬇️) 17/22
اب آخر میں آ کر کارگل کی جنگ کے مقاصد اور اہداف ہی بدل دیئے گئے تاکہ جیت کا اعلان کر سکیں- چلے تھے سیاچن لینے, دنیا کے آگے کشمیر کاز لیئے کھڑے ہوگئے اور کہا کہ منزل آ گئی- ہم اسی..(جاری ⬇️) 19/22
دوستو! مشرّف نے اس ناکامی پر نواز شریف کی طرف سے کمیشن بناے جانے کی تجویز پر حکومت پر شب خون مار کر مارشل لاء لگایا- ہمیشہ کی طرح اپنی غلطی سیاستدان کے گلے میں ڈال کر ڈھنڈوراہ پیٹا کہ ہم نے تو کشمیر کو گلے سے پکڑ لیا تھا,..(جاری ⬇️) 20/22
سب کے پاس اینڈرائڈ فونز موجود ہیں- کبھی کارگل علاقے کو نقشے میں دیکھ کر سوال کیجیئے گا کہ کیا یہاں چند کلومیٹر اندر جا کر کشمیر کو گردن سے..(جاری ⬇️) 21/22
مذکورہ کتاب (اردو میں) میری گوگل ڈرائیو پر موجود ہے, پڑھنے یا ڈاؤن لوڈ کرنے کیلئے لنک پر کلک کریں-
https://t.co/IkVydw7Ghr
🔵 22/22 (END)
More from All
You May Also Like
So it's now October 10, 2018 and....Rod Rosenstein is STILL not fired.
He's STILL in charge of the Mueller investigation.
He's STILL refusing to hand over the McCabe memos.
He's STILL holding up the declassification of the #SpyGate documents & their release to the public.
I love a good cover story.......
The guy had a face-to-face with El Grande Trumpo himself on Air Force One just 2 days ago. Inside just about the most secure SCIF in the world.
And Trump came out of AF1 and gave ol' Rod a big thumbs up!
And so we're right back to 'that dirty rat Rosenstein!' 2 days later.
At this point it's clear some members of Congress are either in on this and helping the cover story or they haven't got a clue and are out in the cold.
Note the conflicting stories about 'Rosenstein cancelled meeting with Congress on Oct 11!"
First, rumors surfaced of a scheduled meeting on Oct. 11 between Rosenstein & members of Congress, and Rosenstein just cancelled it.
He's STILL in charge of the Mueller investigation.
He's STILL refusing to hand over the McCabe memos.
He's STILL holding up the declassification of the #SpyGate documents & their release to the public.
I love a good cover story.......
The guy had a face-to-face with El Grande Trumpo himself on Air Force One just 2 days ago. Inside just about the most secure SCIF in the world.
And Trump came out of AF1 and gave ol' Rod a big thumbs up!
And so we're right back to 'that dirty rat Rosenstein!' 2 days later.
At this point it's clear some members of Congress are either in on this and helping the cover story or they haven't got a clue and are out in the cold.
Note the conflicting stories about 'Rosenstein cancelled meeting with Congress on Oct 11!"
First, rumors surfaced of a scheduled meeting on Oct. 11 between Rosenstein & members of Congress, and Rosenstein just cancelled it.
Rep. Andy Biggs and Rep. Matt Gaetz say DAG Rod Rosenstein cancelled an Oct. 11 appearance before the judiciary and oversight committees. They are now calling for a subpoena. pic.twitter.com/TknVHKjXtd
— Ivan Pentchoukov \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 (@IvanPentchoukov) October 10, 2018
Took me 5 years to get the best Chartink scanners for Stock Market, but you’ll get it in 5 mminutes here ⏰
Do Share the above tweet 👆
These are going to be very simple yet effective pure price action based scanners, no fancy indicators nothing - hope you liked it.
https://t.co/JU0MJIbpRV
52 Week High
One of the classic scanners very you will get strong stocks to Bet on.
https://t.co/V69th0jwBr
Hourly Breakout
This scanner will give you short term bet breakouts like hourly or 2Hr breakout
Volume shocker
Volume spurt in a stock with massive X times
Do Share the above tweet 👆
These are going to be very simple yet effective pure price action based scanners, no fancy indicators nothing - hope you liked it.
https://t.co/JU0MJIbpRV
52 Week High
One of the classic scanners very you will get strong stocks to Bet on.
https://t.co/V69th0jwBr
Hourly Breakout
This scanner will give you short term bet breakouts like hourly or 2Hr breakout
Volume shocker
Volume spurt in a stock with massive X times
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?