Subcutaneous fat is stored under the skin at the surface level.
Visceral fat is far more dangerous because it wraps around organs, releases inflammatory markers, and produces toxic chemicals and hormones.
Your abdominal fat is destroying your organs and setting the stage for diabetes, heart disease, and cancer.
Here's 5 ways you can shed that gut and take back control of your health:
Subcutaneous fat is stored under the skin at the surface level.
Visceral fat is far more dangerous because it wraps around organs, releases inflammatory markers, and produces toxic chemicals and hormones.
It's also common in those who are skinny fat and lack muscle in their upper body with an increased waistline >40 inches in men (think dad bod) and >35 inches in women.
Visceral fat is a sign of the metabolic syndrome which includes:
-High blood pressure
-Obesity
-High cholesterol
-Insulin resistance
These often lead to:
-Heart disease
-Diabetes
-Stroke
-Dementia
1) Too many calories in and too little activity.
2) Alcohol intake plays a major factor in increased visceral fat storage.
3) Genes do play a role in where your body is predisposed to storing fat.
1) Intermittent fasting
Create an 8-10 hour eating window at first to rest/heal your gut.
Reduces gut/systemic inflammation and teaches the body to utilize stored energy.
Burns fat while maintaining metabolic rate.
-Slows down digestion limiting spikes and crashes in blood sugar that lead to insulin resistance and visceral fat storage.
-Increases satiation (fullness) cutting down on the need for snacking.
-Burns 80-100 calories/day extra through digestion.
Alcohol, soda, and juices create massive sugar spikes. They act like an IV of sugar into the bloodstream because there is nothing to slow down digestion.
Over time this leads to insulin resistance and fat storage around the liver and abdominal area.
Lifting weights helps build muscle which is the most metabolically active tissue.
This helps to burn more calories throughout the day and regulate sugar levels.
When sugar levels are stable the body is able to more effectively burn stored fat.
Poor sleep decreases your fullness hormone (leptin) and increases your hunger hormone (ghrelin) causing you to snack.
Bad sleep reduces insulin sensitivity keeping blood sugar levels elevated. Your body will then want to store energy instead of burn it.
1) Intermittent fasting
2) Eat a high protein diet
3) Don't drink your calories
4) Resistance train
5) Prioritize sleep
If you learned something and found value in it, please retweet so others can learn as well.
Follow me @chrisboettcher9 for more on taking control of your health and life. https://t.co/474MV1bmgN
Your abdominal fat is destroying your organs and setting the stage for diabetes, heart disease, and cancer.
— Chris Boettcher (@chrisboettcher9) October 22, 2022
Here's 5 ways you can shed that gut and take back control of your health: pic.twitter.com/hA9OiYEDVx
More from All
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
