This took me 5 years to learn.

I'll teach it to you in 2 minutes

Here are 42 sentences that'll make you more money than a $131,600 business degree:

Your customer's fear of loss is more powerful than their desire for gain.
Don't sell the product, sell the outcome.
Don't lower your prices, increase your value.
Start with a narrow niche first and expand later.
Desirable outcome + proof + scarcity + urgency + guarantee + bonuses = irresistible offer.
Don't rely on social media, build your email list.
Story is the most powerful marketing weapon.
If you try to appeal to everyone, you'll end up appealing to no one.
Ask for the sale every single day.
100 ideal followers are more valuable than 10,000 random followers.
Use retargeting ads to show content and offers to all website visitors & followers, it prints money.
Email your list at least 1x a week.
Always pre-sell your offer before building it.
The greatest skill you can develop is decreasing the time between idea and execution.
People buy with emotion (stories), then justify with logic (statistics, graphs, data).
Study psychology, persuasion, and copywriting.
98% of people are not ready to buy now, but if you keep showing up, they might buy later.
Most money is in the follow-up.
The goal of your front-end offer is to acquire new customers, not to make a profit.
The goal of your back-end offer is to make a profit.
Focus on building a monthly recurring revenue so you don't start each month at $0.
The goal of your marketing is to make your prospects feel understood.
Respond with "I completely understand" to every objection from a prospect.
Your job on a sales call is to ask specific questions, shut up and listen.
Best-known product will beat the best product every single time.
It is not how much you make, it is how much you keep.
He or she who can afford to spend the most to acquire a new customer wins.
Never compromise your reputation for money.
You are selling certainty and security — no matter what you’re selling.
Offer payment plans — but incentive upfront payments.
You don’t need a $3,000 MacBook Pro, $5,000 website, or a $87,000 degree to start a business.
Position your offer as a new opportunity, not another alternative.
Split test your headlines - five times as many people read the headline as read the body copy.
Building an audience and community online is the best investment ever.
Always start your content with a powerful hook.
Use curiosity in your marketing to dramatically increase the response.
Create a lead magnet that attracts your dream clients and repels everybody else.
80% of your time should be spent on income-producing activities.
Give more value for free than what your competitors charge them for.
Imperfect action > Perfect inaction
Amazon, Reddit, Forums, FB Groups, and AnswerThePublic are great for market research.
Automate every repeating task by creating a system.
Which sentence was your favorite?

If you enjoyed this thread:

1. Follow me @stepanhlinka for more of these

2. You might also enjoy my thread where I shared how I went from working in a supermarket to making $40k/mo online.
https://t.co/2hnibPQ6lW
If you want to get more high-paying clients, you might enjoy my daily newsletter: Paid For Skills.

Join 2,000+ subscribers and get actionable marketing & business growth strategies daily. Consumed in 3 minutes or less.

https://t.co/3cgFefcJUm
Also...follow me on Instagram, I share a lot of content on my Instagram stories DAILY!

You might enjoy it if you're an entrepreneur.

https://t.co/68I3tPpyRP

More from All

1. Mini Thread on Conflicts of Interest involving the authors of the Nature Toilet Paper:
https://t.co/VUYbsKGncx
Kristian G. Andersen
Andrew Rambaut
Ian Lipkin
Edward C. Holmes
Robert F. Garry

2. Thanks to @newboxer007 for forwarding the link to the research by an Australian in Taiwan (not on

3. K.Andersen didn't mention "competing interests"
Only Garry listed Zalgen Labs, which we will look at later.
In acknowledgements, Michael Farzan, Wellcome Trust, NIH, ERC & ARC are mentioned.
Author affiliations listed as usual.
Note the 328 Citations!
https://t.co/nmOeohM89Q


4. Kristian Andersen (1)
Andersen worked with USAMRIID & Fort Detrick scientists on research, with Robert Garry, Jens Kuhn & Sina Bavari among


5. Kristian Andersen (2)
Works at Scripps Research Institute, which WAS in serious financial trouble, haemorrhaging 20 million $ a year.
But just when the first virus cases were emerging, they received great news.
They issued a press release dated November 27, 2019:

You May Also Like

MASTER THREAD on Short Strangles.

Curated the best tweets from the best traders who are exceptional at managing strangles.

• Positional Strangles
• Intraday Strangles
• Position Sizing
• How to do Adjustments
• Plenty of Examples
• When to avoid
• Exit Criteria

How to sell Strangles in weekly expiry as explained by boss himself. @Mitesh_Engr

• When to sell
• How to do Adjustments
• Exit


Beautiful explanation on positional option selling by @Mitesh_Engr
Sir on how to sell low premium strangles yourself without paying anyone. This is a free mini course in


1st Live example of managing a strangle by Mitesh Sir. @Mitesh_Engr

• Sold Strangles 20% cap used
• Added 20% cap more when in profit
• Booked profitable leg and rolled up
• Kept rolling up profitable leg
• Booked loss in calls
• Sold only


2nd example by @Mitesh_Engr Sir on converting a directional trade into strangles. Option Sellers can use this for consistent profit.

• Identified a reversal and sold puts

• Puts decayed a lot

• When achieved 2% profit through puts then sold
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".