Give me 2 minutes and I’ll show you an exercise to help you find your purpose.

The exercise is called Ikigai.

It is said to find your life’s worth or purpose and is widely used.

It has also played a role in Japan having the second highest life expectancy in the world.

Let’s break it down.
Ikigai can be split into 4 categories.

What:

• You love
• You are good at
• You can be paid for
• What the world needs
1. What do you love.

When asked, most people will tell you that they have never stopped to think about this because they live such busy lives.

This could be a hobby you get excited about or possibly the feeling of helping others.

There are no wrong answers.
2. What you are good at.

Take out a pen and paper and jot down everything you feel you are good at doing.

As humans we tend to undervalue what we are good at because we assume that there are others better than us.

Remember done is better than perfect.
3. What you can be paid for.

Look towards others that are currently being paid for what is you want to do.

• How did they get started ?
• Can you make a good living ?
• What troubles have they faced ?

Try to map out how you can turn this from an idea into reality.
4. What the world needs.

The world is changing all of the time. You have countless opportunities to spot gaps in the market.

Based on the simple principle of supply and demand.

You must provide a service that is valuable to those using it.
What you love and what you are good at will help you find.

= Your passion.

What you love and what the world needs.

= Your mission.
What the world needs and what you can be paid for.

= Your vocation.

And finally

What you can be paid for + What you are good at.

= Your profession.
Once you have taken time to brainstorm through each section, you should have an idea of what you can pursue to find your purpose.

Imagine your ideal day from start to finish. How does it make you feel ?
You will need to try out what you think you would be good at.

You may think that you would love to do a certain profession however in reality you may find it’s not for you.

It will take trial and error however following Ikigai should give you a better understanding.
Enjoyed this thread ?

Download my free guide:

6 tips to unlock your true potential.

https://t.co/j5O51vthjE

Limited time only (48 hours)
If you enjoyed reading this thread, please retweet the first tweet and follow @mindandglory

https://t.co/zQX8J1Nrq0

This account exists to help you:

⁃Build a successful life
⁃Control your thoughts
⁃Unlock your true potential

More from All

MASTER THREAD on Short Strangles.

Curated the best tweets from the best traders who are exceptional at managing strangles.

• Positional Strangles
• Intraday Strangles
• Position Sizing
• How to do Adjustments
• Plenty of Examples
• When to avoid
• Exit Criteria

How to sell Strangles in weekly expiry as explained by boss himself. @Mitesh_Engr

• When to sell
• How to do Adjustments
• Exit


Beautiful explanation on positional option selling by @Mitesh_Engr
Sir on how to sell low premium strangles yourself without paying anyone. This is a free mini course in


1st Live example of managing a strangle by Mitesh Sir. @Mitesh_Engr

• Sold Strangles 20% cap used
• Added 20% cap more when in profit
• Booked profitable leg and rolled up
• Kept rolling up profitable leg
• Booked loss in calls
• Sold only


2nd example by @Mitesh_Engr Sir on converting a directional trade into strangles. Option Sellers can use this for consistent profit.

• Identified a reversal and sold puts

• Puts decayed a lot

• When achieved 2% profit through puts then sold
1. Mini Thread on Conflicts of Interest involving the authors of the Nature Toilet Paper:
https://t.co/VUYbsKGncx
Kristian G. Andersen
Andrew Rambaut
Ian Lipkin
Edward C. Holmes
Robert F. Garry

2. Thanks to @newboxer007 for forwarding the link to the research by an Australian in Taiwan (not on

3. K.Andersen didn't mention "competing interests"
Only Garry listed Zalgen Labs, which we will look at later.
In acknowledgements, Michael Farzan, Wellcome Trust, NIH, ERC & ARC are mentioned.
Author affiliations listed as usual.
Note the 328 Citations!
https://t.co/nmOeohM89Q


4. Kristian Andersen (1)
Andersen worked with USAMRIID & Fort Detrick scientists on research, with Robert Garry, Jens Kuhn & Sina Bavari among


5. Kristian Andersen (2)
Works at Scripps Research Institute, which WAS in serious financial trouble, haemorrhaging 20 million $ a year.
But just when the first virus cases were emerging, they received great news.
They issued a press release dated November 27, 2019:

You May Also Like

The YouTube algorithm that I helped build in 2011 still recommends the flat earth theory by the *hundreds of millions*. This investigation by @RawStory shows some of the real-life consequences of this badly designed AI.


This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/


A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/

https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/

https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.