"Closed group of validators" is a big fat twisted narrative (not blaming @FatManTerra)

Before
validators involvement:
- 4-5 days had passed (yet to see communication on what was done there)
- the whole ecosystem had come down crashing
- luna supply had hit several trillions

🧵

- supply was going through the roof

My observations:
- validators were added to a chat and smart stake was invited as well
- i dont know what happened before me but it was pre-established that there was some potential bug (related to the huge supply and data type i think)
- the experts (devs / tfl / other industry icons) mentioned that if validators agree, then the chain should be stopped to apply the patch
- not knowing what had happened in last 4-5 days and seeing that the whole ecosystem was crumbling, it made logical sense to support the devs
- while some questions were naturally raised by other validators & smart stake, the scenario (my interpretation) was either apply the fix or face the potential of a broken chain
- so many chains (just look around) make urgent fixes in normal situations and this was a crisis .....
... beyond the imagination of most. as a result, urgent co-ordination was done and chain was stopped, dev's provided updated binaries with the fix, and chain was started again
- later on the same was done for disabling IBC at the request of other chains
- as the chat logs show, Loop team & i have requested few times to re-enable IBC but unfortunately it never got enabled

as a validator, i wish validators were called much earlier (when the situation could have been salvaged) to apply as many fixes as needed
Validators operate a software and are not the developers of the software. Validators are always available to apply updates released by developers.

A summary I shared previously:
https://t.co/4N23aNyfmi

More from All

You May Also Like

So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.


The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.

This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.

The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."

This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.