2/n
The problem I have with "the Cathedral" is the idea of modern tyranny as an emergent phenomenon rather than a machine driven and operated by interested parties.
It's a dressed up way of saying "come on, do you think everyone is in on it?" As if this is a necessary condition.
🧵
Sure, uhm, uh, actually, that origin story, uhm, um, implies that someone is, uh, uhm, in charge and there is uh most definitely not um uhm anyone um in charge https://t.co/CErTonV0Hw pic.twitter.com/yccQgiw8vf
— \U0001f53a\u0280\u1d07\u1d0d\u0274\u1d00\u0274\u1d1b. (@remnantposter) January 5, 2022
2/n
3/n
4/n
5/n
The British gov't covered up the Lusitania's real cargo for 100 years.
https://t.co/wItc75ixZZ
6/n
Was everyone at British and US intel "in on it?" Of course not.
7/n
https://t.co/k6dA4mEGtm
8/n
9/n
10/n
11/n
https://t.co/7mw5A5TaO9
I\u2019ve seen people dismiss scientific studies because they are not peer reviewed. Most of those people don\u2019t realize that @CDCgov publishes scientific studies without peer review. Instead, CDC \u201crigorously\u201d reviews the science to make sure it does NOT conflict with their \u201cpolicy!\u201d pic.twitter.com/g2XIQHtzkP
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 5, 2022
How often do gov't agencies admit to error or wrongdoing? Almost never.
12/n
People outside this process don't even see under the hood, they just repeat what they're told.
13/n
14/n
15/n
16/n
But it was always true all along that m_sks don't work.
17/n
The "experts" flip-flopping on well-established scientific literature published over the course of decades? Probably deliberate.
18/n
F_uci, W_lenksy, even someone like L_ana Wen—they all know what they're doing. There's simply no way they don't.
19/n
I say "regime" because that suggests that somebody is giving orders—that's what's actually happening.
20/n
21/n
22/n
Fi/n
https://t.co/xFSAgWx52g
it really depends on how you interpret it
— \U0001f41dSvevlad, Social Surgeon\U0001f41d (@3rdincarnate) January 5, 2022
in my eyes, the Cathedral makes the institutions look even WORSE because it means that everyone running them is in a big circlejerk (the low levels are irrelevant, they don't count) and therefore irredeemable
https://t.co/SUnCyfYTS3
it's a bug because the amount of people that can be defined as "in charge" exceeds the dunbar number and something about that spooks them so they say "nobody is in charge" like a measuring device when it goes out of bounds
— \U0001f41dSvevlad, Social Surgeon\U0001f41d (@3rdincarnate) January 5, 2022
Weinstein arrived at the same obfuscatory conclusion as Moldberg, through a sh¡tlib's thought process.
👨🍳🤌
https://t.co/TXsWycfZS2
I'm probably the only one in these parts that even knows enough to comment but Eric Weinstein's whole 'DISC' (distributed idea suppression complex) is such a laughably sanitized concept that basically boils down to a conspiracy
— \U0001d412\U0001d415\U0001d415\U0001d400\U0001d418\U0001d404\U0001d403 (@SVVAYED) December 30, 2021
https://t.co/zPG86RDswc
This was my first redpill moment on the dragon germ, when they said you didn't need them, then bought out the entire domestic supply of N-95's, and then suddenly said we needed to wear a mask of some sort.
— Aristophanes Tragedy (@AristophanesTX) January 5, 2022
The only effective ones had already been taken by then.
https://t.co/W2cOwEqGyE
Spontaneous Order in Complex Systems
— eugyppius (@eugyppius1) January 5, 2022
The question, is not whether there are conspiracies, or whether containment benefits our elites. The question, is what is the dominant force driving containment and universal vaccination right now.https://t.co/rih4CwgVP6
The problem with this is that the bad actors are standing by with a defibrillator.
They are doing this on purpose and could stop it any time they want.
https://t.co/9hxRWhI4x9
If they will lie right out of the gate for their own advantage as such, they will lie about everything else if they have to as well.
— Aristophanes Tragedy (@AristophanesTX) January 5, 2022
https://t.co/T3ERBcq0AI
honestly its much scarier if no one is in charge and society just did that
— bjecky (@goofysunday) January 5, 2022
https://t.co/4mhopb398a
pressures makes no sense. You can see him hop between these two positions and try to maintain the "totally decentralized" position aswell in the tucker interview, it's obvious how stupid it is.
— \U0001202dSharmat\U0001f42c (@GnostikDrainer) January 5, 2022
https://t.co/gUAiTwalMu
i think you got it wrong, for me the cathedral is an hydra, that's why Moldbug proposes a totalitarian regime as its only cure. But i'll read your whole thread
— Trying (@Tryin2BeGood) January 5, 2022
https://t.co/ZDNmZuZSSC
The scariest example of this for me was the mass surveillance the NSA was doing with corporations happily assisting. A TON of people knew all about it and no one said shit until Snowden. Insane.
— Mechanism Eight (@mechanism_8) January 5, 2022
https://t.co/GMkkU9HS5c
Moldtermite had to come up with a totally fictitious concept like the "Cathedral" because he doesn't see any real influence from his co-tribalists.
— coma commuter (@commutercon) January 6, 2022
https://t.co/voKmJEGRiS
As I've always interpreted the cathedral model, it is not ought to say "it's none's fault"
— Rex Siciliae (@RexSiciliae) January 6, 2022
Moldbug's cathedral has "the brain", the consensus creating apparatus. Those people do things VERY deliberately, it is them taking decisions etc
https://t.co/miITM8BeMA
Absolutism wouldn't be necessary if you were right because it would mean just replacing people in key positions and things would all get better.
— CryptonMaximus \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 (@CryptonMaximus) January 5, 2022
https://t.co/msDqBgzDtW
I share this critique of systems, (I think Yarvin is equally shallow when on the fundamental reasons why monarchy is the ideal political arrangement)
— slow up (@slow___up) January 6, 2022
but yes at the end of the day, the evil-actor analysis risks the misleading suggestion that the regime is salvageable.
More from All
You May Also Like
If everyone was holding bitcoin on the old x86 in their parents basement, we would be finding a price bottom. The problem is the risk is all pooled at a few brokerages and a network of rotten exchanges with counter party risk that makes AIG circa 2008 look like a good credit.
— Greg Wester (@gwestr) November 25, 2018
The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.
This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.
The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."
This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.