When Satoshi Nakamoto wrote of #Bitcoin:
"It might make sense just to get some in case it catches on"
WHO WAS HE WRITING TO?
A thread 👇👇👇
But it wasn't Satoshi's. 2/
@InfoSecConf 10/
"Satoshi didn’t seem to be trying to solve a technical problem, but rather a social problem. A systemic problem with the legacy financial system. 19/
- Dustin Trammell, OG Bitcoiner 25/
They can get it FREE in e-book or audiobook at https://t.co/VkjZvdKfL0 28/
More from All
ChatGPT is a phenomenal AI Tool.
But don't limit yourself to just ChatGPT.
Here're 8 AI-powered tools you should try in 2023:
1. KaiberAI
@KaiberAI helps you generate beautiful videos in minutes.
Transform your ideas into the visual stories of your dreams with this Amazing Tool.
New features:
1. Upload your custom music
2. Prompt Templates
3. Camera Movements:
Check here
https://t.co/ivnDRf628L
2. @tldview TLDV
Best ChatGPT Alternative for meetings.
Make your meetings 10X more productive with this amazing tool.
Try it now:
https://t.co/vOy3sS4QfJ
3. ComposeAI
Use ComposeAI for generating any text using AI.
It’s will help you write better content in seconds.
Try it here:
https://t.co/ksj5aop5ZI
4. Browser AI
Use this AI tool to extract and monitor data from any website.
Train a robot in 2 minutes to do your work.
No coding required.
https://t.co/nNiawtUMyO
But don't limit yourself to just ChatGPT.
Here're 8 AI-powered tools you should try in 2023:
1. KaiberAI
@KaiberAI helps you generate beautiful videos in minutes.
Transform your ideas into the visual stories of your dreams with this Amazing Tool.
New features:
1. Upload your custom music
2. Prompt Templates
3. Camera Movements:
Check here
https://t.co/ivnDRf628L
2. @tldview TLDV
Best ChatGPT Alternative for meetings.
Make your meetings 10X more productive with this amazing tool.
Try it now:
https://t.co/vOy3sS4QfJ
3. ComposeAI
Use ComposeAI for generating any text using AI.
It’s will help you write better content in seconds.
Try it here:
https://t.co/ksj5aop5ZI
4. Browser AI
Use this AI tool to extract and monitor data from any website.
Train a robot in 2 minutes to do your work.
No coding required.
https://t.co/nNiawtUMyO
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?