The ultimate meta thread on thinking:

1. https://t.co/3ktv8Lh81j
2. https://t.co/FdgxUEpVUC
3. https://t.co/0bvWrntCd2
4. https://t.co/TDScIwsLPy
5. https://t.co/pLGnZlWCEK
6. https://t.co/s16GWy2ByW
7. https://t.co/6bVu6ndLE1
8. https://t.co/MBlvHKxYdt
9. https://t.co/YcDXTR0mJm
10. https://t.co/MXlu53m28h
11. https://t.co/liy9gnNuaS
12. https://t.co/Dh6SOB258W
13. Not a thread, but you should read “How to Think for Yourself” by @paulg: https://t.co/QKWhCXUlwt
14. https://t.co/lF1N2GY2g8
15. Not a thread, but checkout everything by @anthilemoon: https://t.co/KneIhbIzds
16. Now, what do you do with all the new knowledge you’ve created?

Digital Gardening https://t.co/snQzuZv9Ya
And never forget: https://t.co/YzsKwBSDOX

More from All

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq